The End of Work

Table of Contents

• The feeling

• The symptoms

• What I think is actually happening

• 3 reasons for hope

  • 1. Those jobs sucked anyway

  • 2. Even fast things go slow

  • 3. What comes after will be much better

• Summary

The feeling

If you’re like me, you’ve had this strange, uneasy feeling about the job market¹ for a few years now.

It’s like a splinter in the brain. We know something is deeply broken about the whole system, but it’s impossible to grasp or articulate.

I’m writing this because I think I figured it out.

People talk a lot about how AI is going to replace millions of jobs, and how it will also create many more. I think that’s true, but I think there’s a lot more going on here than just AI.

The symptoms

First, why do we even think there’s a problem? For me, it starts with noticing how bad—and how often—work just completely sucks. Like the whole thing—finding work, doing work, being stressed about not losing work. Etc.²  

Most companies, departments, and teams are horribly inefficient, have very little direction, are full of wasted time and efficiency, and are poorly run. It’s constant meetings to talk about the latest corporate fuckery, which only prevents you from doing what you should be doing. It’s change for the sake of change. And when you get excited about a way to fix things, either nobody listens, or they only pretend to before failing to implement it.

Work tends to be a series of disappointments for most people, punctuated by a few rays of light. I was curious about how many people felt this way—not wanting to do a full essay on just my own opinions—and found this from Gallup about the quiet quitting phenomenon.

I’m sure there are lots of factors going into Quiet Quitting, but I think this feeling I’m talking about is one of them.

What I think is actually happening

And that brings me to what I think the real issues are, which are a lot deeper and more unsettling than just, “AI is taking the jobs.”

The ideal number of employees in any company is zero. If a company could run and make money using no people, then that is exactly what it should do. We never think about this or talk about this because it’s very strange and uncomfortable, but it is true. The purpose of companies is not to employ people, it is to provide a product or service in return for money,

Because of that, there is a constant downward pressure on anybody who is employed. It is not a specific pressure from a specific person or department. It is simply a fact of business reality that manifests itself in various ways throughout an organization over time. We have to stop thinking of this as a malicious thing where we should be employed, and they are trying to get rid of us. The truth is exactly the opposite.

Nobody owes anybody a job. The only reason anyone has one is because there was a problem at some point in that business that required a human to do some part of the work. Building on that, if that ever becomes not the case, for a particular person or team or department of human employees, the natural next action is to get rid of them. Again, not because business owners or managers are bad people or anything like that. We need to stop injecting morality into this. Businesses simply should have as few employees and actually any expense as possible.

A good way to think about this is to look at a list of software products your company pays for. Let’s say your company pays for 215 software products that cost us $420,000 a year to own and use. Nobody would object to somebody looking at that list of software finding redundancies and canceling those licenses. That is simply work that is being done by other software, or is not required anymore, so it would be stupid for the business to not cancel or failed to renew those licenses.

It is exactly the same with humans, and no matter what you read or hear, I believe this is the main reason we are seeing disruption in job markets today. I think more and more businesses are seeing themselves as money in and money out, and are seeing human workers as being very expensive and generally not very good at what they do. This is not necessarily because of individual workers but because human organizations and communication are so inefficient and wasteful. So basically, companies are realizing that they are spending millions—or hundreds of millions—of dollars per year on human talent, and they’re realizing it’s not worth it.

So that is 2 pieces: 1) ZERO is the optimum number of employees for any company, and 2) companies are realizing that they’re paying way too much for giant workforces that are not producing near the value being paid. Forgetting any modern technological innovation, these two things combined produce extreme downward pressure on the workforce. It adds pressure, stress, drama, and all sorts of negativity to the practice of finding a job, getting a job, keeping a job, working with coworkers, going through organizational changes, and everything else that goes with being a regular employee. It just basically fucking sucks. And the reason it sucks is because companies ultimately wish that you didn’t exist in the first place. We have forgotten that—or never learned it—and that needs to change.

Now let’s add AI, which if you’ve read any of the stuff I’ve been writing, you know is— in the context of business —a technology for replacing the human intellectual work tasks that make up someone’s job.

Here’s a good example from a recent piece on this topic.

What this example shows is a workflow that a human worker does today—just like millions of similar workflows—but that AI will soon be able to do instead.

It’s just steps, like we can see further down in the piece.

So now we have 3 pieces. The ideal number of employees is zero, companies are extremely unhappy with their current workforces, and just now—starting in 2023 and 2024—it is actually becoming possible to replace human intelligence tasks with technology.

You have to see where this is going. It is not moving towards a few jobs get removed, and a few jobs get added. It’s not moving towards some gentle shifts in workforce dynamics or euphemisms like that. No, we are talking about fundamental change. Now for the main point of this piece.

The entire concept of work that we have had for thousands of years was a temporary model that was required to solve a temporary problem. Namely, people who are trying to build or sell something that required work they were unable to do by themselves. 

Read that again.

The only reason anybody has a job is because some people are builders and creators, and they cannot do the entire job themselves.

That work—which is required to produce those products and services—is the reason people have 9-5 jobs. This is the reason the entire economy works the way it does. Those builders/creators then hire people, who they have to pay, and those people spend that money on things in the economy. And that is the system we are all used to.

Well…

This system goes away when builders and creators can make things by themselves. Which is precisely what AI is about to enable.

So, here’s where we are.

1. The ideal number of employees for a company is zero.

2. The reason companies had employees in the past is ONLY because the founders couldn’t deliver their product/service without human workers.

3. Companies and society has sort of forgotten this over the past decades and it’s been kind of assumed that all companies should have these large workforces, because it’s the job of companies to provide good jobs to society.

4. This hasn’t been working for companies, and company leaders are now noticing that they’re not getting near the value they should be from most employees and teams.

5. So there’s already this realization sinking in, and then we are getting AI at the exact same time.

6. This means at the exact time that company leaders are looking very skeptically at their human resources spending, they’re being presented with an alternative.

OK, so maybe you’re thinking:

Yes, and no. I have three things to offer here that should make you feel somewhat better.

3 reasons for hope

But it’s not all bad. I have 3 reasons for optimism.

1. Those jobs sucked anyway

How many people do you know who work regular 9 to 5 jobs in a knowledge work environment who look forward to Monday? How many people, if you really stood back and looked at your life, think it’s good to spend most of your waking moments getting ready to work, dealing with dumbass work shit, all fucking day, and then trying to destress from that day, just so you can actually enjoy the few hours you have left to live your actual life?

All that so you can hopefully make it to Friday so you can have two days where you hopefully don’t have to think about that hellscape you call work.

Is that the way humans should live on their home planet? If advanced and benign aliens came and visited, and interviewed us, would they not see that as a primitive state of being? Of course they would.

The thing that we are about to lose is not something we should cry over. We should be worried cause losing these jobs will be massively disruptive, and it’s stressful as hell to think about a completely changed future. But these Bullshit Jobs themselves are not something to cherish and remember.

2. Even fast things go slow

This transition will simultaneously happen very fast, but also pretty slowly. Even if there is advanced AGI in 2025 (which would be very fast), it still takes time for new technology to enter into companies and fully replace previous technology or humans.

So it will take a while, and that’s not even taking into account likely legislation that will slow it down even further based on how disruptive it is. So it’s not like half of the workforce will suddenly not have a job in 2026. It will be very fast, but not that fast.

3. What comes after will be much better

And finally—and best of all—what we will be left with afterwards, assuming we survive, will be a much better way to live.

That same AI that took our dumbass jobs away also has the potential to produce extraordinary abundance for humanity, freeing us up to use our days being human rather than bad biological precursors to AI workers.

We weren’t supposed to be moving paperwork, and sorting spreadsheets, and sending meeting invites, and writing computer code. It’s not what we were supposed to be doing.

What we are supposed to be doing is building and creating things for each other. Things that make each other‘s lives better, and richer, and more meaningful.

And that is exactly what we will do on the other side of all of this. I obviously don’t know our chances of making it to this other side, or if/when it happens, exactly how that will play out. That is impossible to know, but what I can tell you is that I am all in on that future, because it doesn’t make sense to me to live any other way.

Sure, the disruption might tear us apart and send us back to the Bronze Age. That’s possible too, but I choose to believe that we will make it out of this. We’ll get out by getting through. And we’ll emerge on the other side better for it.

Summary

1. The primary reason we’re seeing all this disruption in the job market is because we’ve been part of a mass delusion about the very nature of work.

2. We told ourselves that millions of corporate workforce jobs—that pay good salaries, have good benefits, and allow you to save for retirement—were somehow a natural feature of the universe.

3. In fact, that entire paradigm was just a temporary feature of our civilization, caused by builders and creators not being able to do the work required by themselves. And that’s going away.

4. But it’s ok.

5. Most of the jobs sucked anyway, and they took up most of the daily waking hours we were supposed to be spending with family and friends.

6. Plus even if this transition happens really fast, it still won’t be overnight. Big things take a while.

7. And most importantly—what waits for us on the other side is a better way to live. A more human way to live—where we identify as individuals rather than corporate workers and exchange value and meaning as part of a new human-centered economy.

My purpose in writing this is to give an alternative—and hopefully far more satisfying—explanation of the feelings you might’ve been feeling for a very long time. And to give you both some warning—and some hope—with which to move forward.

I’ve oriented my life—since the end of 2022—around thinking about this problem, providing ideas and frameworks around it, and have written hundreds of articles about the problem and how to prepare for it. But rather than give the standard “subscribe to my newsletter” response, I would just say that I’m easy to find.

Connect here and we can continue the conversation. Website | X | Newsletter | Community | LinkedIn

We are going to get through this, and it will be much better once we do.

🫶

1  I’m talking about the knowledge work job market, like IT, etc., not physical or professional work, although I do think they’ll be affected soon as well.

2  I’m specifically speaking of the last few years, say, since 2020.