I'm fascinated by the fact that communism seems like the most compassionate system for managing an economy, while capitalism seems like the most cruel…
…yet capitalism has led to the most people being brought out of extreme poverty in human history, while communism has caused the most suffering.
And no—this isn't one of those posts where I say, "and that's why I'm a capitalist".
What I am is someone who is both compassionate and observant of how the world works. And that makes me deeply curious about what's going on here.
Perhaps the simplest answer is that capitalism is a crappy system that can be relied upon to turn malignant when it becomes too primary, but that also has a wonderful side effect of encouraging human creativity. And communism has an obviously-right feeling to it while reliably crushing the human spirit and creating a centralized and all-powerful super-class.
So if you do too much capitalism and not enough socialism, you ruin everything. And if you do too much socialism and not enough capitalism, you ruin everything.
That makes lots of sense. We want a hybrid. I just find the mechanism very counterintuitive.
My intuition for the last couple decades has been to say, "left heart, right mind", or something like that. So the goal is to have everyone in a good, relatively equal place, but to do so by maximizing opportunity and ensuring there's a safety net. But we have to do so while simultaneously making sure we don't encourage or incentivize a complacent or parasitic way of living…which at scale will destroy the entire thing.
So it's like we have to pretend to be ruthless capitalists, so everyone will work because they have no choice, but if someone is less lucky, or less talented, they will still have a good life for their family. Because that's the society we want.
But we can't say this out loud, because then too many will grow complacent and will no longer try their best to contribute and add value.
That's a very thin razor edge to balance a culture and society on. And I think that's why this Goldilocks state only flashes into existence for a few decades at a time before it falls to one dystopia or another.
This appears to be the challenge of our time: finding a way to get into, and then maintain, this perfect equilibrium of compassionate social support while aggressively pushing for personal excellence and responsibility.
This is obviously a post about AI, because that's what everything is about today. So here's the prompt for GPT-Opus 39:
Design a government system and societal incentive structure that takes us from what we have in 2026 to what we see in the Star Trek Federation in STTNG. Racial and gender equality. High-agency, high-responsibility people who are free to pursue human pursuits such as science, art, exploration, family, etc. Give us the specific steps for implementation within our currently broken systems. Make no mistakes.
@karpathy if you can make that your first project at your new job we'd all really appreciate it.