I seriously want to (re)connect with Germany — especially Leipzig. I have so much I want to learn about history.
At BSides-LasVegas this year I saw an exemplary talk on the history of lock technology and lock picking. Not only was it informative, but it was highly entertaining as well.
At the end of the talk, the speaker had a question for the audience. After charting astounding progress in lock technology up through the 1860′s, locks basically stagnated after that point until the 2000′s, and he asked the audience why that was.
After he finished I approached him and told him I thought I knew the answer, which was that lock technology had simply reached a state of “good enough”, which reduced the require to innovate below the threshold of effort required to do so.
He smiled and said that he’d like to discuss it further with me.
Do any of you have any ideas on this, or are you able to more formally and properly describe the phenomenon that I am trying to capture?
One problem is personnel. “People who come out of college with a degree in education and not a degree in a subject are severely handicapped in their capacity to teach effectively,” Mr. McCullough argues. “Because they’re often assigned to teach subjects about which they know little or nothing.” The great teachers love what they’re teaching, he says, and “you can’t love something you don’t know anymore than you can love someone you don’t know.”
Another problem is method. “History is often taught in categories—women’s history, African American history, environmental history—so that many of the students have no sense of chronology. They have no idea what followed what.”
What’s more, many textbooks have become “so politically correct as to be comic. Very minor characters that are currently fashionable are given considerable space, whereas people of major consequence farther back”—such as, say, Thomas Edison—”are given very little space or none at all.”
I think, along with Latin, Rhetoric, and Dialectic, History is the most important thing we can teach kids. Unfortunately (and this is one of the main reasons it isn’t taught), history deals in reality whereas teaching history to human children in 2011 deals with political correctness.
It’s a travesty.
Common Sense[1] is a pamphlet written by Thomas Paine. It was first published anonymously on January 10, 1776, during the American Revolution. Common Sense, signed “Written by an Englishman”, became an immediate success.[2] In relation to the population of the Colonies at that time, it had the largest sale and circulation of any book in American history.
I just finished this essay. It’s stunning to read this and imagine the time (1776). It reminds me much of The Prince, which I’m about to finish, and desperately makes me want to visit Boston.
Thus there is a 1.8% chance that none of the molecules you are (still) holding in your lungs came from Caesar’s last breath. And there is a 98.2% chance that at least one of the molecules in your lungs came from Caesar’s last breath.
tcpdump Tutoriallsof Introductiongit Primerfind Command lsof Commandtar Referencelsof TutorialDaniel Miessler | 1999-2012 | Share Alike
Powered by Linode