For anyone who’s been befuddled by the “eye” arguments against evolution.

Yeah, they fly.

This is one of the best refutations of the standard creationist arguments I’ve seen in a short video format.

Combined with this one I think we have a pretty strong argument to present to intelligent, open-minded creationists.

If you’re arguing with someone who’ll listen to reason, these two videos are a great place to start. Also check out my Atheists Debate Reference if things head in that direction. ::

It won’t be long now.

This video lays out evolution in a way that will completely astound you-even if you already understand the basics. Simply stunning. Definitely the best presentation of evolution I’ve ever seen.

h+ Magazine is a Transhumanist publication that supports the ideas of Extropianism.

I like these ideas. They give hope while the news takes it away. ::

What follows is an excerpt from a letter Professor Dawkins recently wrote to address a person who had been duped by Ben Stein’s horribly stupid movie, Expelled. This particular piece addresses what many religious and/or anti-evolution people consider to be a major problem with evolution, i.e. the linking between what evolution says about how life evolves vs. how we should build our society as humans.

Richard Dawkins handles the issue quite well (bold emphasis mine):

Now, to the matter of Darwin. The first thing to say is that natural selection is a scientific theory about the way evolution works in fact. It is either true or it is not, and whether or not we like it politically or morally is irrelevant. Scientific theories are not prescriptions for how we should behave. I have many times written (for example in the first chapter of A Devil’s Chaplain) that I am a passionate Darwinian when it comes to the science of how life has actually evolved, but a passionate ANTI-Darwinian when it comes to the politics of how humans ought to behave.

I have several times said that a society based on Darwinian principles would be a very unpleasant society in which to live. I have several times said, starting at the beginning of my very first book, The Selfish Gene, that we should learn to understand natural selection, so that we can oppose any tendency to apply it to human politics. Darwin himself said the same thing, in various different ways. So did his great friend and champion Thomas Henry Huxley.

So don’t ever let anyone give you this lame argument. Think of the female black widow killing its male mate after they have sex. Think of the countless animals that regularly kill their children.

In short, there are countless examples of things that happen in nature, which are worth studying, that we shouldn’t try and emulate. To put it another way, just as we study black widows in order to understand how they live yet don’t promote women killing their mates after sex, we can also study Darwinistic Evolution without applying its principles to human society.: