Jobs on Releasing the First Mac
By Daniel Miessler on August 25th, 2011: Tagged as Apple
I don’t think I’ve ever worked so hard on something, but working on Macintosh was the neatest experience of my life. Almost everyone who worked on it will say that. None of us wanted to release it at the end. It was as though we knew that once it was out of our hands, it wouldn’t be ours anymore. When we finally presented it at the shareholders’ meeting, everyone in the auditorium gave it a five-minute ovation. What was incredible to me was that I could see the Mac team in the first few rows. It was as though none of us could believe we’d actually finished it. Everyone started crying.
Jobs on Creativity
By Daniel Miessler on August 25th, 2011: Tagged as Apple | Creativity
Creativity is just connecting things. When you ask creative people how they did something, they feel a little guilty because they didn’t really do it, they just saw something. It seemed obvious to them after a while. That’s because they were able to connect experiences they’ve had and synthesize new things. And the reason they were able to do that was that they’ve had more experiences or they have thought more about their experiences than other people.
Jobs on Chests of Drawers
By Daniel Miessler on August 25th, 2011: Tagged as Apple | Quotes
When you’re a carpenter making a beautiful chest of drawers, you’re not going to use a piece of plywood on the back, even though it faces the wall and nobody will ever see it. You’ll know it’s there, so you’re going to use a beautiful piece of wood on the back. For you to sleep well at night, the aesthetic, the quality, has to be carried all the way through.
A Steve Jobs Anecdote
By Daniel Miessler on August 25th, 2011: Tagged as Apple
I had always dreamed of working at Apple someday, and, eventually, I did.
For part of my time there, I had an office that received no visible sunlight and had no view of the outside. It wasn’t all bad, I was enjoying my work enough, but I’d go out of my way to try to enjoy the sunshine whenever I had it.
One day, I was working late and left my office to get dinner at the cafeteria. When I stepped outside, I realized it had been the first time I had seen the sun all day, as it had been foggy that morning, and I had skipped lunch.
Steve Jobs Talking About How Apple Makes Hardware
By Daniel Miessler on August 18th, 2011: Tagged as Apple
I’ve said this before, but thought it was worth repeating: It’s in Apple’s DNA that technology alone is not enough. That it’s technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the result that makes our hearts sing.
And nowhere is that more true than in these post-PC devices.
And a lot of folks in this tablet market are rushing in and they’re looking at this as the next PC. The hardware and the software are done by different companies. And they’re talking about speeds and feeds just like they did with PCs.
And our experience and every bone in our body says that that is not the right approach to this. That these are post-PC devices that need to be even easier to use than a PC. That need to be even more intuitive than a PC. And where the software and the hardware and the applications need to intertwine in an even more seamless way than they do on a PC.
And we think we’re on the right track with this. We think we have the right architecture not just in silicon, but in the organization to build these kinds of products.
And so I think we stand a pretty good chance of being pretty competitive in this market. And I hope that what you’ve seen today gives you a good feel for that.
Man, this guy just gets it. And with HP pulling out of PCs and tablets it seems that perhaps nobody else does.
I find it hilarious that the best selling PCs now look like Macs, and Microsoft just announced that Windows 8 is going to have an “App Store”.
It cannot possibly be more obvious that Apple is the only one innovating in the PC space, and that everyone else is just following.
A Philosophical Reason for Preferring Apple Over Android
By Daniel Miessler on July 28th, 2011: Tagged as Android | Apple | Mobile

The horse is dead. Design, feel, features, openness, customizability — we’ve heard it all. The main arguments are well understood by anyone with an interest in this discussion.
But there’s another one that I’ve not heard articulated yet — the argument for why both companies do what they do. Or, more specifically, why one would prefer one or the other based on their respective reasons for being in the mobile space.
I personally like Apple’s reasons for being there much more than Google’s. That is to say, I prefer the philosophy of an egotistical, overly ambitious design freak wanting to take over the world with perfectly designed, functional works of art to that of an ingenious advertising company wanting to drop millions upon millions of copies of their operating system — running on anything (toasters, toothbrushes, tricycles, et. al.) — for the sole purpose of getting more people to see their ads.
As an analogy I imagine two painters — one is an eccentric, pompous old man who spends 3 years per painting and demands of friends and enemies alike that they love his work. He sells very few, from his own home, and generally spends his time locked away trying to impress himself and others.
Another painter — younger and more financially minded — comes along and finds a template he can use to pump out thousands of paintings a year. He sells them for less but makes far more money because he’s on every corner. When Art Magazine asked both painters why they paint, the old man replied that, “Art is life.”, before rudely ending the interview to go back home and paint. The younger painter responded, “Are you kidding? I’m moving 4,000 of these things a year, and they all have my name on them!”
Don’t be confused — I dislike both for different reasons. But given the choice I much prefer backing a company that’s fundamentally tied to me being enthusiastic for my device and my experience vs. one that sees the entire game as a means to an end. ::
June 2011 Mobile Browsing Statistics
By Daniel Miessler on July 19th, 2011: Tagged as Android | Apple

Android is supposedly selling way more phones than Apple, but everything I see in terms of usage data points to Apple being way ahead. Not that my site is an indicator, but in terms of devices used to hit this site, Apple is seriously dominant.
Granted, my site has a design slant at times, and I do get on the Apple fanboy on occasion, but I don’t think this has anything to do with these stats since most of my traffic comes from Google searches for technical keywords, like tcpdump, lsof, etc.
Anyway, fascinating numbers. I’m very curious to see how the percentages fluctuate over time as both companies implement their strategies. ::
How to Record a Custom For Your iPhone Using OS X
By Daniel Miessler on July 16th, 2011: Tagged as Apple | iPhone

I decided recently that I wanted to record my girl doing high-tech sounds like “dee-doot-deet” or “dee-doot-doot” so I could use them as my incoming text message sounds. I also wanted to be able to record myself saying, “Text from Chris”, and set that as the text sound from Chris, etc. I think it adds personal touch to the mobile device, and it also keeps me from looking at my phone when someone else gets a text nearby.
Anyway, the Internet wasn’t much help, and I had to figure out how to do it myself. Here are the steps:
- Create a new Podcast project in GarageBand
- Record and trim your segment to satisfaction
- In the Share menu, select “Send Ringtone to iTunes”
- Make sure you’re syncing Ringtones to your phone within iTunes, and sync
- Go into your sound settings or the individual contact and assign the ringtone
::
The iPhone is Dominating in Europe, Android in South Korea
By Daniel Miessler on July 15th, 2011: Tagged as Android | Apple
The Loop is reporting on a study released Wednesday by the Yankee Group that indicates that 40% of potential smartphone buyers in Europe said that they would go for an iPhone.
The study was a poll of 5,000 consumers and 2,250 IT decision-makers working at companies across France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK.
The study indicated that Android devices came in a distant second at 19% and BlackBerry and Nokia followed at 17% and 15% respectively.
I’ve seen articles stating there’s similar domination of Android in South Korea. So what can we draw from that? Marketing? Cultural values?
And will the Windows phone gather velocity in South Korea since that country is so Windows-centric?