<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WWW Stands For Worthless3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/www-stands-for-worthless3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/www-stands-for-worthless3</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:44:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/www-stands-for-worthless3/comment-page-1#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 02:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/204#comment-936</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, I believe that just typing the body itself will do the trick; I don&#039;t think we need to do the protocol &lt;em&gt;or&lt;/em&gt; the TLD - at least for .com domains. It could get a bit tricky when a .com exists and you want to go to the .org, but these are fairly rare during a given day (for me anyway).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hmm, so I wonder if I should edit my post ... yeah, I think I will.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I believe that just typing the body itself will do the trick; I don&#8217;t think we need to do the protocol <em>or</em> the TLD &#8211; at least for .com domains. It could get a bit tricky when a .com exists and you want to go to the .org, but these are fairly rare during a given day (for me anyway).</p>

<p>Hmm, so I wonder if I should edit my post &#8230; yeah, I think I will.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/www-stands-for-worthless3/comment-page-1#comment-245257</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 02:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/204#comment-245257</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, I believe that just typing the body itself will do the trick; I don&#039;t think we need to do the protocol &lt;em&gt;or&lt;/em&gt; the TLD - at least for .com domains. It could get a bit tricky when a .com exists and you want to go to the .org, but these are fairly rare during a given day (for me anyway).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hmm, so I wonder if I should edit my post ... yeah, I think I will.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I believe that just typing the body itself will do the trick; I don&#8217;t think we need to do the protocol <em>or</em> the TLD &#8211; at least for .com domains. It could get a bit tricky when a .com exists and you want to go to the .org, but these are fairly rare during a given day (for me anyway).</p>

<p>Hmm, so I wonder if I should edit my post &#8230; yeah, I think I will.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/www-stands-for-worthless3/comment-page-1#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/204#comment-929</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;in the line of effiiency.  If you mean effiiency on your part, in typing etc., i ALWAYS enter addresses that are prepended with &quot;www.&quot; and appened with &quot;.com&quot; as the body followed by ctrl+enter.  You should try this.  so, in the address bar, you would type wired then hit ctrl+enter and then www.wired.com appears in the address bar.  All that I can figure w/o more research is that this combination of key works in win 2000 and up, mozilla, and IE, and only with www.___.com addys.  I may play w/ it some more to give you more info if you want it.  Let me know if you already do this regularly so that I may attack myself appropriately.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the line of effiiency.  If you mean effiiency on your part, in typing etc., i ALWAYS enter addresses that are prepended with &#8220;www.&#8221; and appened with &#8220;.com&#8221; as the body followed by ctrl+enter.  You should try this.  so, in the address bar, you would type wired then hit ctrl+enter and then <a href="http://www.wired.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com</a> appears in the address bar.  All that I can figure w/o more research is that this combination of key works in win 2000 and up, mozilla, and IE, and only with <a href="http://www.___.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.___.com</a> addys.  I may play w/ it some more to give you more info if you want it.  Let me know if you already do this regularly so that I may attack myself appropriately.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/www-stands-for-worthless3/comment-page-1#comment-245256</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/204#comment-245256</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;in the line of effiiency.  If you mean effiiency on your part, in typing etc., i ALWAYS enter addresses that are prepended with &quot;www.&quot; and appened with &quot;.com&quot; as the body followed by ctrl+enter.  You should try this.  so, in the address bar, you would type wired then hit ctrl+enter and then www.wired.com appears in the address bar.  All that I can figure w/o more research is that this combination of key works in win 2000 and up, mozilla, and IE, and only with www.___.com addys.  I may play w/ it some more to give you more info if you want it.  Let me know if you already do this regularly so that I may attack myself appropriately.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the line of effiiency.  If you mean effiiency on your part, in typing etc., i ALWAYS enter addresses that are prepended with &#8220;www.&#8221; and appened with &#8220;.com&#8221; as the body followed by ctrl+enter.  You should try this.  so, in the address bar, you would type wired then hit ctrl+enter and then <a href="http://www.wired.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com</a> appears in the address bar.  All that I can figure w/o more research is that this combination of key works in win 2000 and up, mozilla, and IE, and only with <a href="http://www.___.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.___.com</a> addys.  I may play w/ it some more to give you more info if you want it.  Let me know if you already do this regularly so that I may attack myself appropriately.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/www-stands-for-worthless3/comment-page-1#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/204#comment-924</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;An excellent thing, as Douglas Adams pointed out that &quot;double-u, double-u, double-u&quot; is the only abbreviation that takes three times longer to say that the phrase is stands for.  However, I hand out URLs all day long on the phone, and I never prepend the www.  It never fails--the person on the other end &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; says, &quot;http-colon-slash-slash-double-u-double-u-double-u?&quot;
&quot;Yes,&quot; I say.  &quot;Yes...that&#039;s absolutely right.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;People will do things the &lt;em&gt;long&lt;/em&gt; way because it&#039;s what they&#039;re familiar with...they do &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; like change, even when it&#039;s obviously to their benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent thing, as Douglas Adams pointed out that &#8220;double-u, double-u, double-u&#8221; is the only abbreviation that takes three times longer to say that the phrase is stands for.  However, I hand out URLs all day long on the phone, and I never prepend the www.  It never fails&#8211;the person on the other end <em>always</em> says, &#8220;http-colon-slash-slash-double-u-double-u-double-u?&#8221;
&#8220;Yes,&#8221; I say.  &#8220;Yes&#8230;that&#8217;s absolutely right.&#8221;</p>

<p>People will do things the <em>long</em> way because it&#8217;s what they&#8217;re familiar with&#8230;they do <em>not</em> like change, even when it&#8217;s obviously to their benefit.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/www-stands-for-worthless3/comment-page-1#comment-245255</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/204#comment-245255</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;An excellent thing, as Douglas Adams pointed out that &quot;double-u, double-u, double-u&quot; is the only abbreviation that takes three times longer to say that the phrase is stands for.  However, I hand out URLs all day long on the phone, and I never prepend the www.  It never fails--the person on the other end &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; says, &quot;http-colon-slash-slash-double-u-double-u-double-u?&quot;
&quot;Yes,&quot; I say.  &quot;Yes...that&#039;s absolutely right.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;People will do things the &lt;em&gt;long&lt;/em&gt; way because it&#039;s what they&#039;re familiar with...they do &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; like change, even when it&#039;s obviously to their benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent thing, as Douglas Adams pointed out that &#8220;double-u, double-u, double-u&#8221; is the only abbreviation that takes three times longer to say that the phrase is stands for.  However, I hand out URLs all day long on the phone, and I never prepend the www.  It never fails&#8211;the person on the other end <em>always</em> says, &#8220;http-colon-slash-slash-double-u-double-u-double-u?&#8221;
&#8220;Yes,&#8221; I say.  &#8220;Yes&#8230;that&#8217;s absolutely right.&#8221;</p>

<p>People will do things the <em>long</em> way because it&#8217;s what they&#8217;re familiar with&#8230;they do <em>not</em> like change, even when it&#8217;s obviously to their benefit.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

