<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Twitter Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:44:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Use Twitter Search to Find Interesting People to Follow &#124; dmiessler.com</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works/comment-page-1#comment-241058</link>
		<dc:creator>Use Twitter Search to Find Interesting People to Follow &#124; dmiessler.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works#comment-241058</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] When to Blog vs. Tweet &#124; dmiessler.com ] [ Why Twitter Works &#124; dmiessler.com [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When to Blog vs. Tweet | dmiessler.com ] [ Why Twitter Works | dmiessler.com [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mercurial &#187; Talk is easy</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works/comment-page-1#comment-240318</link>
		<dc:creator>Mercurial &#187; Talk is easy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works#comment-240318</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] loves twitter, now we have lists and top tens and the like. This, though, caught my attention: why twitter works: Twitter, on the other hand, by having the deepest personal penetration (mobile phone) combined [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] loves twitter, now we have lists and top tens and the like. This, though, caught my attention: why twitter works: Twitter, on the other hand, by having the deepest personal penetration (mobile phone) combined [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works/comment-page-1#comment-242116</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works#comment-242116</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Cool. I&#039;m pretty sure it was you. It was a good comment--helped me grow. Thanks for that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. I&#39;m pretty sure it was you. It was a good comment&#8211;helped me grow. Thanks for that.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exabyte</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works/comment-page-1#comment-242115</link>
		<dc:creator>exabyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works#comment-242115</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It may be ... I don&#039;t know.. I&#039;ve given feedback on your posts over the years.... so .... I don&#039;t know offhand.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be &#8230; I don&#39;t know.. I&#39;ve given feedback on your posts over the years&#8230;. so &#8230;. I don&#39;t know offhand.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works/comment-page-1#comment-240304</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works#comment-240304</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Cool. I&#039;m pretty sure it was you. It was a good comment--helped me grow. Thanks for that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. I&#39;m pretty sure it was you. It was a good comment&#8211;helped me grow. Thanks for that.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exabyte</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works/comment-page-1#comment-240301</link>
		<dc:creator>exabyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works#comment-240301</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It may be ... I don&#039;t know.. I&#039;ve given feedback on your posts over the years.... so .... I don&#039;t know offhand.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be &#8230; I don&#39;t know.. I&#39;ve given feedback on your posts over the years&#8230;. so &#8230;. I don&#39;t know offhand.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works/comment-page-1#comment-240288</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works#comment-240288</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;By the way, is this the same exabyte that blasted me for my stance on global warming?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, is this the same exabyte that blasted me for my stance on global warming?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works/comment-page-1#comment-240287</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works#comment-240287</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I mostly agree with you, but I think you&#039;re missing a subtle difference between email clients and text messaging. Email clients are still somewhat cumbersome on most phones. Many of them suck horribly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For you and I they are pretty rich, because we use iPhone&#039;s and G1&#039;s, but that&#039;s not the experience for most people who have &quot;regular&quot; phones. I&#039;d argue that something like 50-75% of people know how to use their text messaging on a regular phone, while something like 2-10% know how to use their phone&#039;s email client.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As such, I think texting still provides the most penetration.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mostly agree with you, but I think you&#39;re missing a subtle difference between email clients and text messaging. Email clients are still somewhat cumbersome on most phones. Many of them suck horribly.<br /><br />For you and I they are pretty rich, because we use iPhone&#39;s and G1&#39;s, but that&#39;s not the experience for most people who have &#8220;regular&#8221; phones. I&#39;d argue that something like 50-75% of people know how to use their text messaging on a regular phone, while something like 2-10% know how to use their phone&#39;s email client.<br /><br />As such, I think texting still provides the most penetration.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exabyte</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works/comment-page-1#comment-240285</link>
		<dc:creator>exabyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/why-twitter-works#comment-240285</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It sounds like you&#039;re trying to work this out in your mind, through a blog post (which is ok). These days, it&#039;s just as easy to email on a mobile as it is to tweet. They&#039;re equally passive in that you can create them at any time and can both twitter and e-mail can be checked at any time, and can in turn, replied to at any time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tweets are simply better for the short radar blip of info, and email is for the longer-winded thoughts. On a mobile device, I prefer email simply because it accommodates any length and can do everything tweets can, in a unified interface without the 140 character limit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It takes as many &quot;presses&quot; on my mobile for me to tweet as it does for me to e-mail on my phone (Android G1). In your blog post, you&#039;ve really only described why e-mail OR twitter helps us keep in touch with those who have moved.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter is simply a hybrid of e-mail and instant message, with a 140 character limit and the message body in the main thread: that&#039;s all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My preference actually would be for friends and colleagues to simply join an IRC channel, and idle there. Use an SSH session from their smartphone (Android G1 or iPhone) to rejoin a SCREEN session connected to an IRSSI client and join the ongoing discussion, with a bot in place to send SMS&#039;s via some !command. One can dream, can&#039;t they?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like you&#39;re trying to work this out in your mind, through a blog post (which is ok). These days, it&#39;s just as easy to email on a mobile as it is to tweet. They&#39;re equally passive in that you can create them at any time and can both twitter and e-mail can be checked at any time, and can in turn, replied to at any time.<br /><br />Tweets are simply better for the short radar blip of info, and email is for the longer-winded thoughts. On a mobile device, I prefer email simply because it accommodates any length and can do everything tweets can, in a unified interface without the 140 character limit.<br /><br />It takes as many &#8220;presses&#8221; on my mobile for me to tweet as it does for me to e-mail on my phone (Android G1). In your blog post, you&#39;ve really only described why e-mail OR twitter helps us keep in touch with those who have moved.<br /><br />Twitter is simply a hybrid of e-mail and instant message, with a 140 character limit and the message body in the main thread: that&#39;s all.<br /><br />My preference actually would be for friends and colleagues to simply join an IRC channel, and idle there. Use an SSH session from their smartphone (Android G1 or iPhone) to rejoin a SCREEN session connected to an IRSSI client and join the ongoing discussion, with a bot in place to send SMS&#39;s via some !command. One can dream, can&#39;t they?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

