Why Bit.ly is my Favorite URL Shorterner

It’s one of mine as well. Another to look into is adjix.com

It’s one of mine as well. Another to look into is adjix.com

It’s one of mine as well. Another to look into is adjix.com

decenturl.com is a simple but good one as well

decenturl.com is a simple but good one as well

decenturl.com is a simple but good one as well

decenturl.com is a simple but good one as well

decenturl.com is a simple but good one as well

decenturl.com is a simple but good one as well

decenturl.com is a simple but good one as well

So, I get why you would want to use bit.ly and tinyurl for twitter, but isn’t it a bit odd considering your knowledge of XSS?

So, I get why you would want to use bit.ly and tinyurl for twitter, but isn’t it a bit odd considering your knowledge of XSS?

Shane, it all comes down to knowing the source and context of the link you’re clicking. I only follow those kinds of links when they are within the context of a trusted environment, like from a friend on Twitter.

I would never click on random links on a page, for example, and especially wouldn’t if the destination was obfuscated through a shortening service.

But it’s a good question. I use context and source-trust to protect me.

Shane, it all comes down to knowing the source and context of the link you’re clicking. I only follow those kinds of links when they are within the context of a trusted environment, like from a friend on Twitter.

I would never click on random links on a page, for example, and especially wouldn’t if the destination was obfuscated through a shortening service.

But it’s a good question. I use context and source-trust to protect me.

Shane, it all comes down to knowing the source and context of the link you’re clicking. I only follow those kinds of links when they are within the context of a trusted environment, like from a friend on Twitter.

I would never click on random links on a page, for example, and especially wouldn’t if the destination was obfuscated through a shortening service.

But it’s a good question. I use context and source-trust to protect me.

Shane, it all comes down to knowing the source and context of the link you’re clicking. I only follow those kinds of links when they are within the context of a trusted environment, like from a friend on Twitter.

I would never click on random links on a page, for example, and especially wouldn’t if the destination was obfuscated through a shortening service.

But it’s a good question. I use context and source-trust to protect me.

Shane, it all comes down to knowing the source and context of the link you’re clicking. I only follow those kinds of links when they are within the context of a trusted environment, like from a friend on Twitter.

I would never click on random links on a page, for example, and especially wouldn’t if the destination was obfuscated through a shortening service.

But it’s a good question. I use context and source-trust to protect me.

Shane, it all comes down to knowing the source and context of the link you’re clicking. I only follow those kinds of links when they are within the context of a trusted environment, like from a friend on Twitter.

I would never click on random links on a page, for example, and especially wouldn’t if the destination was obfuscated through a shortening service.

But it’s a good question. I use context and source-trust to protect me.

Shane, it all comes down to knowing the source and context of the link you’re clicking. I only follow those kinds of links when they are within the context of a trusted environment, like from a friend on Twitter.

I would never click on random links on a page, for example, and especially wouldn’t if the destination was obfuscated through a shortening service.

But it’s a good question. I use context and source-trust to protect me.