<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Explained in Three Paragraphs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ☯ Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs/comment-page-1#comment-241917</link>
		<dc:creator>☯ Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 06:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs#comment-241917</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Test.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ☯ Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs/comment-page-1#comment-241675</link>
		<dc:creator>☯ Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs#comment-241675</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Test.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cooperati</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs/comment-page-1#comment-241667</link>
		<dc:creator>cooperati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 04:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs#comment-241667</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Those are very good reasons why Twitter is making headway. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, I really value the limiting aspect, forcing people to make deliberate statements. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, people overdue it. &quot;Who knew brushing my dog&#039;s teeth would be so effin cool!&quot; is Twitter abuse. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-=T=-&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are very good reasons why Twitter is making headway. <br /><br />But, I really value the limiting aspect, forcing people to make deliberate statements. <br /><br />Yes, people overdue it. &#8220;Who knew brushing my dog&#39;s teeth would be so effin cool!&#8221; is Twitter abuse. <br /><br />-=T=-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mubix</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs/comment-page-1#comment-241655</link>
		<dc:creator>mubix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs#comment-241655</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think you&#039;re right Daniel, it&#039;s a great way to keep in contact with friends who aren&#039;t exactly &#039;hang out after work&#039; distances away. I also believe it&#039;s the &#039;arms distance&#039; that twitter provides that makes it great. People covet their Facebook, IM, and email accounts like they are secrets to hide. Twitter gives away only your handle and name. And only a finite amount more after that if you want. You can block who you want to block, follow who you want to follow. It&#039;s a sort of open anonymity that breaks down barriers of communication and confrontation to allow for interactions and meetings to occur that otherwise wouldn&#039;t have ever happened.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#39;re right Daniel, it&#39;s a great way to keep in contact with friends who aren&#39;t exactly &#39;hang out after work&#39; distances away. I also believe it&#39;s the &#39;arms distance&#39; that twitter provides that makes it great. People covet their Facebook, IM, and email accounts like they are secrets to hide. Twitter gives away only your handle and name. And only a finite amount more after that if you want. You can block who you want to block, follow who you want to follow. It&#39;s a sort of open anonymity that breaks down barriers of communication and confrontation to allow for interactions and meetings to occur that otherwise wouldn&#39;t have ever happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan (@therealdancohen)</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs/comment-page-1#comment-241654</link>
		<dc:creator>dan (@therealdancohen)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs#comment-241654</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;facebook does what you talked about better than Twitter does.  Twitter is great - or can be great - but not for those reason.   it&#039;s social bookmarking on steroids - searchable, sortable, simple and with desktop clients that extend it&#039;s usability. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the personal connection stuff is theoretically nice but not what drives it&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>facebook does what you talked about better than Twitter does.  Twitter is great &#8211; or can be great &#8211; but not for those reason.   it&#39;s social bookmarking on steroids &#8211; searchable, sortable, simple and with desktop clients that extend it&#39;s usability. <br /><br />the personal connection stuff is theoretically nice but not what drives it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs/comment-page-1#comment-241653</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs#comment-241653</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The menial stuff that was talked about in that video is the part that is a fad, and it will pass. The medium itself, however, will endure for the reasons I mention in this piece. And I fixed the typo; thanks. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The menial stuff that was talked about in that video is the part that is a fad, and it will pass. The medium itself, however, will endure for the reasons I mention in this piece. And I fixed the typo; thanks. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Explained&#8230; &#124; The Fry Side</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs/comment-page-1#comment-241652</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Explained&#8230; &#124; The Fry Side</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs#comment-241652</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Miessler Explains Twitter: [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Miessler Explains Twitter: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarlM</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs/comment-page-1#comment-241650</link>
		<dc:creator>CarlM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/twitter-explained-in-three-paragraphs#comment-241650</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I like your Freudian Typo &quot;out of SITE, out of mind&quot; ... very &quot;web&quot; of you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the rest .. your explanation might help me understand twitter if people used it only to stay in touch with their old friends.  I remain more convinced the VERY humerous anti-twitter animation you linked to some time back.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your Freudian Typo &#8220;out of SITE, out of mind&#8221; &#8230; very &#8220;web&#8221; of you.<br /><br />As for the rest .. your explanation might help me understand twitter if people used it only to stay in touch with their old friends.  I remain more convinced the VERY humerous anti-twitter animation you linked to some time back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

