<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There Is Such A Thing As Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/there-is-such-a-thing-as-wrong/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/there-is-such-a-thing-as-wrong</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmiessler.com &#124; blog</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/there-is-such-a-thing-as-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-2377</link>
		<dc:creator>dmiessler.com &#124; blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 02:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/682#comment-2377</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] In my previous post about culture, a friend commented that we must guard against the idea that there is only one way to live. I agree completely. Surely that&#8217;s true if the guideline being used is a strict one, i.e. it lays out dogma that must be followed to the letter and such. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In my previous post about culture, a friend commented that we must guard against the idea that there is only one way to live. I agree completely. Surely that&#8217;s true if the guideline being used is a strict one, i.e. it lays out dogma that must be followed to the letter and such. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl M</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/there-is-such-a-thing-as-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-2372</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 16:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/682#comment-2372</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Of course you are right that there are WRONG ways to live.  And, there are good reasons for correcting such wrongs at the local, regional, national, and international level.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, there is a danger (a greater danger?  maybe, maybe not) in the attitude that there is only ONE &lt;em&gt;right&lt;/em&gt; way to live.  I certainly don&#039;t think that you are saying that there is only one right way to live, but this is certainly the attitude of many oppressive governments (like China&#039;s ... though they may be changing somewhat).  Stopping bad things is one thing, stopping NEW things is something else altogether.  Stopping bad things is one thing, stopping &quot;negative&quot; things (like criticism of governmental policies) is something else altogether.  Now ... who gets to define &quot;bad&quot;?  Again, I agree with you that there are some things that are simply &quot;bad&quot; and that I would hope would be universally agreed upon as &quot;bad.&quot;  I would include such things as racism, sexism, etc.  But there are parts of the world that don&#039;t view these as bad (racism seems to be less overt at the governmental level, but not so with sexism in some parts of the world).    I would hope that religion is not where we seek the answers to what is right and what is wrong, but there are MANY (even here in the US) who believe that this is the ONLY POSSIBLE source for such answers.  So, how do we proceed?  I would argue that there are no easy answers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course you are right that there are WRONG ways to live.  And, there are good reasons for correcting such wrongs at the local, regional, national, and international level.</p>

<p>However, there is a danger (a greater danger?  maybe, maybe not) in the attitude that there is only ONE <em>right</em> way to live.  I certainly don&#8217;t think that you are saying that there is only one right way to live, but this is certainly the attitude of many oppressive governments (like China&#8217;s &#8230; though they may be changing somewhat).  Stopping bad things is one thing, stopping NEW things is something else altogether.  Stopping bad things is one thing, stopping &#8220;negative&#8221; things (like criticism of governmental policies) is something else altogether.  Now &#8230; who gets to define &#8220;bad&#8221;?  Again, I agree with you that there are some things that are simply &#8220;bad&#8221; and that I would hope would be universally agreed upon as &#8220;bad.&#8221;  I would include such things as racism, sexism, etc.  But there are parts of the world that don&#8217;t view these as bad (racism seems to be less overt at the governmental level, but not so with sexism in some parts of the world).    I would hope that religion is not where we seek the answers to what is right and what is wrong, but there are MANY (even here in the US) who believe that this is the ONLY POSSIBLE source for such answers.  So, how do we proceed?  I would argue that there are no easy answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl M</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/there-is-such-a-thing-as-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-245772</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/682#comment-245772</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Of course you are right that there are WRONG ways to live.  And, there are good reasons for correcting such wrongs at the local, regional, national, and international level.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, there is a danger (a greater danger?  maybe, maybe not) in the attitude that there is only ONE &lt;em&gt;right&lt;/em&gt; way to live.  I certainly don&#039;t think that you are saying that there is only one right way to live, but this is certainly the attitude of many oppressive governments (like China&#039;s ... though they may be changing somewhat).  Stopping bad things is one thing, stopping NEW things is something else altogether.  Stopping bad things is one thing, stopping &quot;negative&quot; things (like criticism of governmental policies) is something else altogether.  Now ... who gets to define &quot;bad&quot;?  Again, I agree with you that there are some things that are simply &quot;bad&quot; and that I would hope would be universally agreed upon as &quot;bad.&quot;  I would include such things as racism, sexism, etc.  But there are parts of the world that don&#039;t view these as bad (racism seems to be less overt at the governmental level, but not so with sexism in some parts of the world).    I would hope that religion is not where we seek the answers to what is right and what is wrong, but there are MANY (even here in the US) who believe that this is the ONLY POSSIBLE source for such answers.  So, how do we proceed?  I would argue that there are no easy answers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course you are right that there are WRONG ways to live.  And, there are good reasons for correcting such wrongs at the local, regional, national, and international level.</p>

<p>However, there is a danger (a greater danger?  maybe, maybe not) in the attitude that there is only ONE <em>right</em> way to live.  I certainly don&#8217;t think that you are saying that there is only one right way to live, but this is certainly the attitude of many oppressive governments (like China&#8217;s &#8230; though they may be changing somewhat).  Stopping bad things is one thing, stopping NEW things is something else altogether.  Stopping bad things is one thing, stopping &#8220;negative&#8221; things (like criticism of governmental policies) is something else altogether.  Now &#8230; who gets to define &#8220;bad&#8221;?  Again, I agree with you that there are some things that are simply &#8220;bad&#8221; and that I would hope would be universally agreed upon as &#8220;bad.&#8221;  I would include such things as racism, sexism, etc.  But there are parts of the world that don&#8217;t view these as bad (racism seems to be less overt at the governmental level, but not so with sexism in some parts of the world).    I would hope that religion is not where we seek the answers to what is right and what is wrong, but there are MANY (even here in the US) who believe that this is the ONLY POSSIBLE source for such answers.  So, how do we proceed?  I would argue that there are no easy answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

