<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Will To Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-will-to-power/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-will-to-power</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven G. Harms</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-will-to-power/comment-page-1#comment-30109</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven G. Harms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1152#comment-30109</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d be very wary of the WTP and its integration into the larger Nietzsche&#039;s &lt;em&gt;ouvre&lt;/em&gt;. N. presented very many dynamite ideas and, owing to his Dionysian affiliations, presented them with a great amount of, shall we say, gusto.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s when these ideas are linked together that some very unfortunate consequences get justified as extensions of Nietzschean philosophy (or get associated with the actual historical philosopher).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The WTP is one of those ideas.  Surely N. mentioned this idea in many spots, but thanks to his proto-Nazi redactrice of a sister some of the dots got connected in ways that I don&#039;t believe Fred would have intended.  Surely National Socialism would have been something he would have &lt;strong&gt;hated&lt;/strong&gt; owing to the cult of personality, the religious overtones, etc.  This was not a man who could be bridled ( except in a certain famous photo of he Paul Ree, and &quot;Lou&quot; (Louisa) Salom&#233;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think that the real root of N. ideology that underlines the WTP is this: responsibility.  As the legacy states of imperial Europe prepared to march off to their undoing and the commercial class helped quicken the nation state Nietzsche&#039;s message was one of hope and promise:  You can live your own life, and in exchange for this absolute freedom sans monach, class, rank, etc, comes absolute responsibility.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I like to think that the will to power is a will to responsibility, or a will to ruthlessness (i.e. fastidiousness, focus, unrelentingness).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be very wary of the WTP and its integration into the larger Nietzsche&#8217;s <em>ouvre</em>. N. presented very many dynamite ideas and, owing to his Dionysian affiliations, presented them with a great amount of, shall we say, gusto.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s when these ideas are linked together that some very unfortunate consequences get justified as extensions of Nietzschean philosophy (or get associated with the actual historical philosopher).</p>

<p>The WTP is one of those ideas.  Surely N. mentioned this idea in many spots, but thanks to his proto-Nazi redactrice of a sister some of the dots got connected in ways that I don&#8217;t believe Fred would have intended.  Surely National Socialism would have been something he would have <strong>hated</strong> owing to the cult of personality, the religious overtones, etc.  This was not a man who could be bridled ( except in a certain famous photo of he Paul Ree, and &#8220;Lou&#8221; (Louisa) Salom&eacute;).</p>

<p>I think that the real root of N. ideology that underlines the WTP is this: responsibility.  As the legacy states of imperial Europe prepared to march off to their undoing and the commercial class helped quicken the nation state Nietzsche&#8217;s message was one of hope and promise:  You can live your own life, and in exchange for this absolute freedom sans monach, class, rank, etc, comes absolute responsibility.</p>

<p>I like to think that the will to power is a will to responsibility, or a will to ruthlessness (i.e. fastidiousness, focus, unrelentingness).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven G. Harms</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-will-to-power/comment-page-1#comment-247034</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven G. Harms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1152#comment-247034</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d be very wary of the WTP and its integration into the larger Nietzsche&#039;s &lt;em&gt;ouvre&lt;/em&gt;. N. presented very many dynamite ideas and, owing to his Dionysian affiliations, presented them with a great amount of, shall we say, gusto.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s when these ideas are linked together that some very unfortunate consequences get justified as extensions of Nietzschean philosophy (or get associated with the actual historical philosopher).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The WTP is one of those ideas.  Surely N. mentioned this idea in many spots, but thanks to his proto-Nazi redactrice of a sister some of the dots got connected in ways that I don&#039;t believe Fred would have intended.  Surely National Socialism would have been something he would have &lt;strong&gt;hated&lt;/strong&gt; owing to the cult of personality, the religious overtones, etc.  This was not a man who could be bridled ( except in a certain famous photo of he Paul Ree, and &quot;Lou&quot; (Louisa) Salom&#233;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think that the real root of N. ideology that underlines the WTP is this: responsibility.  As the legacy states of imperial Europe prepared to march off to their undoing and the commercial class helped quicken the nation state Nietzsche&#039;s message was one of hope and promise:  You can live your own life, and in exchange for this absolute freedom sans monach, class, rank, etc, comes absolute responsibility.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I like to think that the will to power is a will to responsibility, or a will to ruthlessness (i.e. fastidiousness, focus, unrelentingness).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be very wary of the WTP and its integration into the larger Nietzsche&#8217;s <em>ouvre</em>. N. presented very many dynamite ideas and, owing to his Dionysian affiliations, presented them with a great amount of, shall we say, gusto.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s when these ideas are linked together that some very unfortunate consequences get justified as extensions of Nietzschean philosophy (or get associated with the actual historical philosopher).</p>

<p>The WTP is one of those ideas.  Surely N. mentioned this idea in many spots, but thanks to his proto-Nazi redactrice of a sister some of the dots got connected in ways that I don&#8217;t believe Fred would have intended.  Surely National Socialism would have been something he would have <strong>hated</strong> owing to the cult of personality, the religious overtones, etc.  This was not a man who could be bridled ( except in a certain famous photo of he Paul Ree, and &#8220;Lou&#8221; (Louisa) Salom&eacute;).</p>

<p>I think that the real root of N. ideology that underlines the WTP is this: responsibility.  As the legacy states of imperial Europe prepared to march off to their undoing and the commercial class helped quicken the nation state Nietzsche&#8217;s message was one of hope and promise:  You can live your own life, and in exchange for this absolute freedom sans monach, class, rank, etc, comes absolute responsibility.</p>

<p>I like to think that the will to power is a will to responsibility, or a will to ruthlessness (i.e. fastidiousness, focus, unrelentingness).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

