http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-only-people-fighting-are-people-i-dont-want-to-win grep understanding Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:44:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-only-people-fighting-are-people-i-dont-want-to-win/comment-page-1#comment-244704 RC Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:17:05 +0000 http://danielmiessler.com/?p=7103#comment-244704 <p>Radical Islam may be a threat of a kind, but it wouldn't be if we didn't try to fuck over their countries so often (see Shah of Iran, countless other attempts to 'create a democracy'). You're simply not tackling the root of the resentment if you only blame Islamic cultural intolerance (which is a problem, no doubt).</p> Radical Islam may be a threat of a kind, but it wouldn't be if we didn't try to fuck over their countries so often (see Shah of Iran, countless other attempts to 'create a democracy'). You're simply not tackling the root of the resentment if you only blame Islamic cultural intolerance (which is a problem, no doubt).

]]> http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-only-people-fighting-are-people-i-dont-want-to-win/comment-page-1#comment-243808 RC Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:17:05 +0000 http://danielmiessler.com/?p=7103#comment-243808 <p>Radical Islam may be a threat of a kind, but it wouldn't be if we didn't try to fuck over their countries so often (see Shah of Iran, countless other attempts to 'create a democracy'). You're simply not tackling the root of the resentment if you only blame Islamic cultural intolerance (which is a problem, no doubt).</p> Radical Islam may be a threat of a kind, but it wouldn't be if we didn't try to fuck over their countries so often (see Shah of Iran, countless other attempts to 'create a democracy'). You're simply not tackling the root of the resentment if you only blame Islamic cultural intolerance (which is a problem, no doubt).

]]> http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-only-people-fighting-are-people-i-dont-want-to-win/comment-page-1#comment-243798 CarlM Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:41:43 +0000 http://danielmiessler.com/?p=7103#comment-243798 <p>EVERYONE identifies RADICAL Islam as a threat. Where have you been? <br><br>I think that your real issue is that you'd prefer that Islam is identified as a threat (or in different terms .. that you have a different definition of RADICAL).</p> EVERYONE identifies RADICAL Islam as a threat. Where have you been?

I think that your real issue is that you'd prefer that Islam is identified as a threat (or in different terms .. that you have a different definition of RADICAL).

]]> http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-only-people-fighting-are-people-i-dont-want-to-win/comment-page-1#comment-243795 cooperati Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:37:13 +0000 http://danielmiessler.com/?p=7103#comment-243795 <p>One way to gauge who to go at war with, and who to side with, is the nature of the battle you want to wage first, and which you want to wage least.<br><br>Bible thumpers, though sometimes unweildly in logic and lean in the means of expressing worthwhile substance as they are lacking in being open to superior processes, are not equal to violent Islamo-fascists. The difference should be acknowledged, and appreciable. <br><br>Perhaps a strategy based on priorities is best. One can, and possibly must be an ally against the other. Which would you choose?<br><br>-=T=-</p> One way to gauge who to go at war with, and who to side with, is the nature of the battle you want to wage first, and which you want to wage least.

Bible thumpers, though sometimes unweildly in logic and lean in the means of expressing worthwhile substance as they are lacking in being open to superior processes, are not equal to violent Islamo-fascists. The difference should be acknowledged, and appreciable.

Perhaps a strategy based on priorities is best. One can, and possibly must be an ally against the other. Which would you choose?

-=T=-

]]>