The First Thing the Next President of the United States Must Do

By Daniel Miessler on June 15th, 2007: Tagged as America | Culture | Politics | World
  • Will the USA stop bullying Russia?

    They are stiff scared, they are surrounded by hostile regimes (due to political manipulation by the States), they have no time to think about economy recovery because more and more trouble is coming from American plan of Russia's disintegration.

    I lived in poverty from 12 because my country (the Soviet Union) has collapsed. It did not have a chance like China to stop and reconsider its ways, improve the life of people. Communism was bad, but the American imperialism is even worse: it stops at nothing to achieve its goals.

    The USA have to apologise to me and countless Russians whose lives they made miserable in 80s and 90s.
  • thank you for thinking, Daniel...
  • E Pluribus Unum
    The first thing the next US President should do is bomb Iran into the Stone Age.
  • agassi
    What a bullshit post
  • atomic
    "America is peerless when justly fighting to defend itself or its allies." - what a joke! Why apologise and at the same time restate the same ignorant arrogance that the that the world has come to hate?
  • i see that several have taken to the conservitive line of thinking on this. i.e. -bullshit post, bombing iran. What these people have failed to see as they drown in there patriotic hatred is the fact that we do not belong in Iraq. Simple. Furthermore, why have we not got Osama the one the CIA put up as the figurehead (even though they set it up) which is why we dont have him. Anyway i digress. I once thought that "might makes right" the only problem is if you can in you mind justify the utter destruction of a culture because of its values then why can you not understand the same response from said culture. I do not remember at any point Islamic bomber planes, soilders, and other military landing on our soil, destroying our cities and murdering our children. If you think 9/11 is even close to the civilians we have killed over the years then guess again, it is true those who did it should pay but are we even sure who did it. I guess when you have an education system that ranks 70th in the world this is the going to be the reflection of the mass mentality.

    As for the post, this is not a bullshit post. It is at least looking to repair our greatly damaged relationships with those around the world. The world is not a vaccum and the US is not the only place on earth. Besides what gives us the right to tell people how to think, maybe they dont want to be like us, maybe that is why they still live where they live because they dont think like us. I am not forgetting what happend, but before you try your patriotic shit on me remember that Japan blasted us in Pearl Harbor and Toyota, Honda, Sony and others have become huge products in our market and i am sure you own some so shut the fuck up and get real. Bombs dont solve problems they make them and should only be used as a last resort. If you have any question as to how many military operations the US has engaged in over the last oh....50 years go to http://www.anti-war.com and take a look. We kill allot and it has nothing to do with freedom. Maybe then you will understand this post
  • Billy the Blog
    It is a pity that the next prime Minister of Great Britain will not say the same thing.At least in 18 months the USA can kick the incumbent president out. Sadly, we will have to carry on much longer, and the other lot are nearly as useless.
  • Mind
    No doubt about it. Mistakes have been made. But I might point out a few things that are rarely if ever mentioned. First of all, these few years of the Bush Administration were basically cleaning up after the previous 8 years of foreign policy mismanagement by the Clinton Administration. They chose to ignore signs of a world wide Terrorism movement that was first noticed in 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center which killed 6 people and injured thousands. The Clinton Administration chose to ignore the incident and view it as a criminal matter instead of the Terrorism movement that it was. The Clinton administration foreign policy failed in Somalia which emboldened Osama Bin Laden to organize and support attacks on American interests world wide. They failed to respond to the Khobar Tower bombings in Saudi Arabia in 1996 killing 19 Americans and injuring hundreds more. Failed to prevent the bombing of US embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 which killed 258 people, and injured more then 5000. Failed to adequately respond in the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000 which killed 17 American Sailors. In the eight years of the Clinton administration, they failed to enforce the UN inspections of Saddam Hussien's weapons programs. We should ask ourselves if Saddam didn't have weapons why did he refuse inspections? Either he had WMD's and was hiding them well, or he wanted us to THINK he had them. Forcing inspections could have avoided the Iraqi war that followed.

    It's pretty clear that if the United States had acted more forcefully during those 8 disasterous years, we'd probably would not have experienced 9/11., nor would we be in this protracted insurgency inside of Iraq.

    Have mistakes been made? Yes. But it is grossly unfair to blame Bush for all the failures. Since 9/11 we've been in a struggle against a stateless enemy which is not bound by rules of conduct. Where we've failed is in upholding our principles and becoming more like the enemies that would seek our destruction.

    All it would have taken was a few small determined actions years ago to avoid the large actions that we have been forced to take now.
  • luke
    Mind, your "But Clinton" argument is tired and well debunked.
    Here are some points where you are in error:

    Bush was warned prior to 9-11 and did nothing.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_Laden_Determin...

    Saddam DID allow inspections, and NOTHING like WMDs were ever found. We invaded anyway.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3323633.stm

    Clinton did in fact take action. Republicans attacked him for doing it.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?ht...

    Please read the above and get a clue.
  • Alex J Freeman
    The growing discontent with the 2 party system is a call to action! We must stand up as citizens of this country and demand change. Since most politicians have made it clear they care not for what the citizenry want only special interests get the attention of Washington. We have only one recourse VOTE!
    There is one candidate out there that has consistently voted for retaining our civil rights, preserving the constitution, against unbalanced budgets, against preemptive war, for limited government, against higher taxes, against the communist federal reserve and the IRS, and has voted against congressional pay raises and has never taken any paid junkets.
    He has 20 years of unwaivering voting record to all of the above mentioned, and has garnered both strong support from congressmen that care and ambivalence from congressmen that care not for the constitution nor the oath they swear to when taking office.
    We must support him in any way we can!
    But don't take my word for it check out his you tube or myspace page of just Google him and just try to find something bad about this guy. He is truly a gift to America and whether or not he is elected Dr. Paul will definitely go down in history as one of Americas finest!
  • LOL

    Ron Paul spam on a Ron Paul supporter's website.
  • tim
    well rounded point of view.

    lol.

    -=T=-
  • Eamon Landon
    Oh I agree. I agree with Olbermann as well, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6210240/

    Daniel, the word "travesty" is perfect. That is a perfect description of an administration who thinks that the constitution is "quaint".

    It is never unpatriotic to criticize the present government. I love my country, but the Bush administration is repugment to the ideals of this country.
  • Kundi
    Another thing people need to do, congress need to do, is to 1) verify the facts, 2) if confirmed that there was uncontrolled misuse of power, abuse of the system, how did it happen, 3) amend the constitution or legislate to build frame work and prevent such things from happening again.

    I think with constitution and legislations stay relatively rigid against social, technology changes, they are becoming game pieces for some rich and powerfuls.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Twitter Microblog

twitter_icon      facebook_icon

Sample Original Content


Information Security

Tutorials and Primers

Culture & Society

Technology & Science

Politics

Philosophy & Religion

Miscellaneous

Tools & Projects


Blog Archives