Comments on: The Difference Between CSRF and Clickjacking http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-difference-between-csrf-and-clickjacking grep understanding Fri, 25 May 2012 02:15:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: TIMM http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-difference-between-csrf-and-clickjacking/comment-page-1#comment-213336 TIMM Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:55:10 +0000 http://dmiessler.com/?p=3575#comment-213336 <p>"For the moment, the best defense against clickjacking attacks is to use Firefox with the NoScript add-on installed. Users running that combination will be safe, said Hansen, against "a very good chunk of the issues, 99.99% at this point.""</p> <p>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Spam%2C+Malware+and+Vulnerabilities&articleId=9115700&taxonomyId=85&pageNumber=2</p> <p>-=T=-</p> “For the moment, the best defense against clickjacking attacks is to use Firefox with the NoScript add-on installed. Users running that combination will be safe, said Hansen, against “a very good chunk of the issues, 99.99% at this point.”"

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Spam%2C+Malware+and+Vulnerabilities&articleId=9115700&taxonomyId=85&pageNumber=2

-=T=-

]]> By: TIMM http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-difference-between-csrf-and-clickjacking/comment-page-1#comment-253000 TIMM Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:55:00 +0000 http://dmiessler.com/?p=3575#comment-253000 <p>"For the moment, the best defense against clickjacking attacks is to use Firefox with the NoScript add-on installed. Users running that combination will be safe, said Hansen, against "a very good chunk of the issues, 99.99% at this point.""</p> <p>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Spam%2C+Malware+and+Vulnerabilities&articleId=9115700&taxonomyId=85&pageNumber=2</p> <p>-=T=-</p> “For the moment, the best defense against clickjacking attacks is to use Firefox with the NoScript add-on installed. Users running that combination will be safe, said Hansen, against “a very good chunk of the issues, 99.99% at this point.”"

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Spam%2C+Malware+and+Vulnerabilities&articleId=9115700&taxonomyId=85&pageNumber=2

-=T=-

]]> By: TIMM http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-difference-between-csrf-and-clickjacking/comment-page-1#comment-253001 TIMM Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:55:00 +0000 http://dmiessler.com/?p=3575#comment-253001 <p>"For the moment, the best defense against clickjacking attacks is to use Firefox with the NoScript add-on installed. Users running that combination will be safe, said Hansen, against "a very good chunk of the issues, 99.99% at this point.""</p> <p>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Spam%2C+Malware+and+Vulnerabilities&articleId=9115700&taxonomyId=85&pageNumber=2</p> <p>-=T=-</p> “For the moment, the best defense against clickjacking attacks is to use Firefox with the NoScript add-on installed. Users running that combination will be safe, said Hansen, against “a very good chunk of the issues, 99.99% at this point.”"

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Spam%2C+Malware+and+Vulnerabilities&articleId=9115700&taxonomyId=85&pageNumber=2

-=T=-

]]>