<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best Piece of Infosec Marketing I&#8217;ve Seen in a While</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:44:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-134980</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while#comment-134980</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As for the PCI 6.6 segment - the dotDefender will do the job.
The dotDefender simply plugs in and is running within a few minutes without any complication in configuration and maintenance as compared to hardware is very low.
You can check it out at: http://www.applicure.com&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tom&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the PCI 6.6 segment &#8211; the dotDefender will do the job.
The dotDefender simply plugs in and is running within a few minutes without any complication in configuration and maintenance as compared to hardware is very low.
You can check it out at: <a href="http://www.applicure.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.applicure.com</a></p>

<p>Tom</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-251190</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while#comment-251190</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As for the PCI 6.6 segment - the dotDefender will do the job.
The dotDefender simply plugs in and is running within a few minutes without any complication in configuration and maintenance as compared to hardware is very low.
You can check it out at: http://www.applicure.com&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tom&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the PCI 6.6 segment &#8211; the dotDefender will do the job.
The dotDefender simply plugs in and is running within a few minutes without any complication in configuration and maintenance as compared to hardware is very low.
You can check it out at: <a href="http://www.applicure.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.applicure.com</a></p>

<p>Tom</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuza55</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-130112</link>
		<dc:creator>kuza55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while#comment-130112</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not going to pitch for WhiteHat or F5, but the reason this single PCI requirement has been targeted is because it is the only one which relates to web applications, and WhiteHat is a webappsec company.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to pitch for WhiteHat or F5, but the reason this single PCI requirement has been targeted is because it is the only one which relates to web applications, and WhiteHat is a webappsec company.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuza55</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-251189</link>
		<dc:creator>kuza55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while#comment-251189</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not going to pitch for WhiteHat or F5, but the reason this single PCI requirement has been targeted is because it is the only one which relates to web applications, and WhiteHat is a webappsec company.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to pitch for WhiteHat or F5, but the reason this single PCI requirement has been targeted is because it is the only one which relates to web applications, and WhiteHat is a webappsec company.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim F.</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-129469</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while#comment-129469</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So they meet one of the &lt;em&gt;eleven&lt;/em&gt; requirements for PCI compliance.  Why is that impressive?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they meet one of the <em>eleven</em> requirements for PCI compliance.  Why is that impressive?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim F.</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-251188</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-best-piece-of-infosec-marketing-ive-seen-in-a-while#comment-251188</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So they meet one of the &lt;em&gt;eleven&lt;/em&gt; requirements for PCI compliance.  Why is that impressive?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they meet one of the <em>eleven</em> requirements for PCI compliance.  Why is that impressive?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

