<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Signing with Initials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-149376</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 03:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-149376</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;LOL, nice comment, md.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, nice comment, md.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-251720</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-251720</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;LOL, nice comment, md.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, nice comment, md.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: md</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-149355</link>
		<dc:creator>md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-149355</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope you didn&#039;t think I was pompous when sending you emails!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I use md as my signature and name for a lot of reasons.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hate my last name. Dudlik. Its terrible. (dud-lick. not dude-lick, but still bad)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;my website/email address show my name. Mark is common enough.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;md makes me seem like i might be a doctor. (kidding)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I dont use all my initials because then i&#039;d spell out mad. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think its just a shorthand that can simplify things. I will sign
Mark on first time or more formal emails, usually. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ive been consistent enough with md that some people just call me that offline now too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I would find more pompous is people who use their entire names (and have numbers)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks
Mark Anthony Dudlik II &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(seriously, worst name ever)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you didn&#8217;t think I was pompous when sending you emails!</p>

<p>I use md as my signature and name for a lot of reasons.  </p>

<ol>
<li><p>I hate my last name. Dudlik. Its terrible. (dud-lick. not dude-lick, but still bad)</p></li>
<li><p>my website/email address show my name. Mark is common enough.</p></li>
<li><p>md makes me seem like i might be a doctor. (kidding)</p></li>
</ol>

<p>I dont use all my initials because then i&#8217;d spell out mad. </p>

<p>I think its just a shorthand that can simplify things. I will sign
Mark on first time or more formal emails, usually. </p>

<p>Ive been consistent enough with md that some people just call me that offline now too.</p>

<p>What I would find more pompous is people who use their entire names (and have numbers)</p>

<p>Thanks
Mark Anthony Dudlik II </p>

<p>(seriously, worst name ever)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: md</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-251719</link>
		<dc:creator>md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-251719</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope you didn&#039;t think I was pompous when sending you emails!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I use md as my signature and name for a lot of reasons.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hate my last name. Dudlik. Its terrible. (dud-lick. not dude-lick, but still bad)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;my website/email address show my name. Mark is common enough.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;md makes me seem like i might be a doctor. (kidding)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I dont use all my initials because then i&#039;d spell out mad. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think its just a shorthand that can simplify things. I will sign
Mark on first time or more formal emails, usually. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ive been consistent enough with md that some people just call me that offline now too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I would find more pompous is people who use their entire names (and have numbers)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks
Mark Anthony Dudlik II &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(seriously, worst name ever)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you didn&#8217;t think I was pompous when sending you emails!</p>

<p>I use md as my signature and name for a lot of reasons.  </p>

<ol>
<li><p>I hate my last name. Dudlik. Its terrible. (dud-lick. not dude-lick, but still bad)</p></li>
<li><p>my website/email address show my name. Mark is common enough.</p></li>
<li><p>md makes me seem like i might be a doctor. (kidding)</p></li>
</ol>

<p>I dont use all my initials because then i&#8217;d spell out mad. </p>

<p>I think its just a shorthand that can simplify things. I will sign
Mark on first time or more formal emails, usually. </p>

<p>Ive been consistent enough with md that some people just call me that offline now too.</p>

<p>What I would find more pompous is people who use their entire names (and have numbers)</p>

<p>Thanks
Mark Anthony Dudlik II </p>

<p>(seriously, worst name ever)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven G. Harms</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-149204</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven G. Harms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-149204</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agggggghhh. Need preview function for comments.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agggggghhh. Need preview function for comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven G. Harms</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-251718</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven G. Harms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-251718</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agggggghhh. Need preview function for comments.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agggggghhh. Need preview function for comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven G. Harms</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-149203</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven G. Harms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-149203</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DM&lt;/strong&gt; is better because he thinks you are either &lt;strong&gt;D&lt;/strong&gt;anger&lt;strong&gt;M&lt;/strong&gt;ouse or &lt;strong&gt;Dungeon&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Master&lt;/strong&gt;: either of which are inexpressably cool ( especially with the D&amp;D 4.0 release later this month ).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But to address the question there are indeed different standards of communication&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hacker
My name&#039;s in the from field, my email address is in the from field, what&#039;s the point of salutation?  Just send the message and be done. Think of all the precious bits you slaughter with you antiquated formality (Lenin would have loved high-tech).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hacker trying to convince someone
Adopt the formalities of Dear &lt;em&gt;Blank&lt;/em&gt; / ...Thomas J. Hacker&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Manager
All formalities, all the time, unless talking to staff and using the non-countable address &quot;Team:&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Middle-Manager
Manager + Themed Graphic Stationary&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Senior Manager
Middle-Manager plus photo in header bar&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Engineering Manager
See Hacker&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CEO
Someone else writes my emails for me.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DM</strong> is better because he thinks you are either <strong>D</strong>anger<strong>M</strong>ouse or <strong>Dungeon</strong><strong>Master</strong>: either of which are inexpressably cool ( especially with the D&amp;D 4.0 release later this month ).</p>

<p>But to address the question there are indeed different standards of communication</p>

<p>Hacker
My name&#8217;s in the from field, my email address is in the from field, what&#8217;s the point of salutation?  Just send the message and be done. Think of all the precious bits you slaughter with you antiquated formality (Lenin would have loved high-tech).</p>

<p>Hacker trying to convince someone
Adopt the formalities of Dear <em>Blank</em> / &#8230;Thomas J. Hacker</p>

<p>Manager
All formalities, all the time, unless talking to staff and using the non-countable address &#8220;Team:&#8221;.</p>

<p>Middle-Manager
Manager + Themed Graphic Stationary</p>

<p>Senior Manager
Middle-Manager plus photo in header bar</p>

<p>Engineering Manager
See Hacker</p>

<p>CEO
Someone else writes my emails for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven G. Harms</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-251717</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven G. Harms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-251717</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DM&lt;/strong&gt; is better because he thinks you are either &lt;strong&gt;D&lt;/strong&gt;anger&lt;strong&gt;M&lt;/strong&gt;ouse or &lt;strong&gt;Dungeon&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Master&lt;/strong&gt;: either of which are inexpressably cool ( especially with the D&amp;D 4.0 release later this month ).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But to address the question there are indeed different standards of communication&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hacker
My name&#039;s in the from field, my email address is in the from field, what&#039;s the point of salutation?  Just send the message and be done. Think of all the precious bits you slaughter with you antiquated formality (Lenin would have loved high-tech).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hacker trying to convince someone
Adopt the formalities of Dear &lt;em&gt;Blank&lt;/em&gt; / ...Thomas J. Hacker&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Manager
All formalities, all the time, unless talking to staff and using the non-countable address &quot;Team:&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Middle-Manager
Manager + Themed Graphic Stationary&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Senior Manager
Middle-Manager plus photo in header bar&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Engineering Manager
See Hacker&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CEO
Someone else writes my emails for me.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DM</strong> is better because he thinks you are either <strong>D</strong>anger<strong>M</strong>ouse or <strong>Dungeon</strong><strong>Master</strong>: either of which are inexpressably cool ( especially with the D&amp;D 4.0 release later this month ).</p>

<p>But to address the question there are indeed different standards of communication</p>

<p>Hacker
My name&#8217;s in the from field, my email address is in the from field, what&#8217;s the point of salutation?  Just send the message and be done. Think of all the precious bits you slaughter with you antiquated formality (Lenin would have loved high-tech).</p>

<p>Hacker trying to convince someone
Adopt the formalities of Dear <em>Blank</em> / &#8230;Thomas J. Hacker</p>

<p>Manager
All formalities, all the time, unless talking to staff and using the non-countable address &#8220;Team:&#8221;.</p>

<p>Middle-Manager
Manager + Themed Graphic Stationary</p>

<p>Senior Manager
Middle-Manager plus photo in header bar</p>

<p>Engineering Manager
See Hacker</p>

<p>CEO
Someone else writes my emails for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-148885</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 14:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-148885</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So the general theme of the responses makes sense -- add additional signature information as the formality of the message increases.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Arthur, why is DM better than drm? Capitalization? Or the negative association with Digital Rights Management?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>

<p>So the general theme of the responses makes sense &#8212; add additional signature information as the formality of the message increases.</p>

<p>Arthur, why is DM better than drm? Capitalization? Or the negative association with Digital Rights Management?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-251716</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-251716</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So the general theme of the responses makes sense -- add additional signature information as the formality of the message increases.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Arthur, why is DM better than drm? Capitalization? Or the negative association with Digital Rights Management?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>

<p>So the general theme of the responses makes sense &#8212; add additional signature information as the formality of the message increases.</p>

<p>Arthur, why is DM better than drm? Capitalization? Or the negative association with Digital Rights Management?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Doohan</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-148854</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Doohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-148854</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A signature on a letter (along w the address) served to identify the sender - in an email that requirement is already fulfilled so unless ones email address is somehow obscure (dm25@hotmail.com) or not intuitable then &quot;Daniel&quot; conveys no extra info.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Formality (manners, etiquette, customs) serve to smooth interactions between strangers - therefore the amount of formality indicates the lack of trust between two parties. Inapproriate formality creates barriers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But for you &quot;DM&quot; or &quot;D&quot; is way better than &quot;drm&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AD&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A signature on a letter (along w the address) served to identify the sender &#8211; in an email that requirement is already fulfilled so unless ones email address is somehow obscure (dm25@hotmail.com) or not intuitable then &#8220;Daniel&#8221; conveys no extra info.</p>

<p>Formality (manners, etiquette, customs) serve to smooth interactions between strangers &#8211; therefore the amount of formality indicates the lack of trust between two parties. Inapproriate formality creates barriers.</p>

<p>But for you &#8220;DM&#8221; or &#8220;D&#8221; is way better than &#8220;drm&#8221;</p>

<p>AD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Doohan</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-251715</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Doohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-251715</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A signature on a letter (along w the address) served to identify the sender - in an email that requirement is already fulfilled so unless ones email address is somehow obscure (dm25@hotmail.com) or not intuitable then &quot;Daniel&quot; conveys no extra info.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Formality (manners, etiquette, customs) serve to smooth interactions between strangers - therefore the amount of formality indicates the lack of trust between two parties. Inapproriate formality creates barriers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But for you &quot;DM&quot; or &quot;D&quot; is way better than &quot;drm&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AD&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A signature on a letter (along w the address) served to identify the sender &#8211; in an email that requirement is already fulfilled so unless ones email address is somehow obscure (dm25@hotmail.com) or not intuitable then &#8220;Daniel&#8221; conveys no extra info.</p>

<p>Formality (manners, etiquette, customs) serve to smooth interactions between strangers &#8211; therefore the amount of formality indicates the lack of trust between two parties. Inapproriate formality creates barriers.</p>

<p>But for you &#8220;DM&#8221; or &#8220;D&#8221; is way better than &#8220;drm&#8221;</p>

<p>AD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Rice</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-148736</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-148736</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve come to the point where I don&#039;t even use a signature when sending internal company e-mail to folks I normally interact with.  None of that, &quot;Hi John,&quot; and ending with, &quot;Thanks, Bob.&quot;  The formality feels unnecessary and artificial, plus it physically makes e-mail threads longer to parse.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, I&#039;d agree most would use initials as a short-hand because it&#039;s easier.  Sending something to an official contact outside the company would require the complete diplomatic package - full name, company logo and all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve come to the point where I don&#8217;t even use a signature when sending internal company e-mail to folks I normally interact with.  None of that, &#8220;Hi John,&#8221; and ending with, &#8220;Thanks, Bob.&#8221;  The formality feels unnecessary and artificial, plus it physically makes e-mail threads longer to parse.</p>

<p>That said, I&#8217;d agree most would use initials as a short-hand because it&#8217;s easier.  Sending something to an official contact outside the company would require the complete diplomatic package &#8211; full name, company logo and all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Rice</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-251714</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-251714</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve come to the point where I don&#039;t even use a signature when sending internal company e-mail to folks I normally interact with.  None of that, &quot;Hi John,&quot; and ending with, &quot;Thanks, Bob.&quot;  The formality feels unnecessary and artificial, plus it physically makes e-mail threads longer to parse.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, I&#039;d agree most would use initials as a short-hand because it&#039;s easier.  Sending something to an official contact outside the company would require the complete diplomatic package - full name, company logo and all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve come to the point where I don&#8217;t even use a signature when sending internal company e-mail to folks I normally interact with.  None of that, &#8220;Hi John,&#8221; and ending with, &#8220;Thanks, Bob.&#8221;  The formality feels unnecessary and artificial, plus it physically makes e-mail threads longer to parse.</p>

<p>That said, I&#8217;d agree most would use initials as a short-hand because it&#8217;s easier.  Sending something to an official contact outside the company would require the complete diplomatic package &#8211; full name, company logo and all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy L. Gaddis</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-148670</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy L. Gaddis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-148670</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Thanks,
-j&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;as the first part of my signature, just because I&#039;m lazy, but depending on who I&#039;m e-mailing I&#039;ll often remove the -j and put my name in (too be a bit more &quot;formal&quot;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know lots of others who do the same.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have:</p>

<p>&#8220;Thanks,
-j&#8221;</p>

<p>as the first part of my signature, just because I&#8217;m lazy, but depending on who I&#8217;m e-mailing I&#8217;ll often remove the -j and put my name in (too be a bit more &#8220;formal&#8221;).</p>

<p>I know lots of others who do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy L. Gaddis</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-251713</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy L. Gaddis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-251713</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Thanks,
-j&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;as the first part of my signature, just because I&#039;m lazy, but depending on who I&#039;m e-mailing I&#039;ll often remove the -j and put my name in (too be a bit more &quot;formal&quot;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know lots of others who do the same.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have:</p>

<p>&#8220;Thanks,
-j&#8221;</p>

<p>as the first part of my signature, just because I&#8217;m lazy, but depending on who I&#8217;m e-mailing I&#8217;ll often remove the -j and put my name in (too be a bit more &#8220;formal&#8221;).</p>

<p>I know lots of others who do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Bool</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-148660</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Bool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 19:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-148660</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&#039;Digital Rights Management&#039;... Don&#039;t you currently feel sufficiently hated? ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Digital Rights Management&#8217;&#8230; Don&#8217;t you currently feel sufficiently hated? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Bool</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-251712</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Bool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-251712</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&#039;Digital Rights Management&#039;... Don&#039;t you currently feel sufficiently hated? ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Digital Rights Management&#8217;&#8230; Don&#8217;t you currently feel sufficiently hated? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

