Signing with Initials

By Daniel Miessler on May 31st, 2008: Tagged as Psychology | Writing
  • Adrian Bool

    ‘Digital Rights Management’… Don’t you currently feel sufficiently hated? ;-)

  • Adrian Bool

    ‘Digital Rights Management’… Don’t you currently feel sufficiently hated? ;-)

  • http://commonabnormality.com/ Jeremy L. Gaddis

    I have:

    “Thanks, -j”

    as the first part of my signature, just because I’m lazy, but depending on who I’m e-mailing I’ll often remove the -j and put my name in (too be a bit more “formal”).

    I know lots of others who do the same.

  • http://commonabnormality.com/ Jeremy L. Gaddis

    I have:

    “Thanks, -j”

    as the first part of my signature, just because I’m lazy, but depending on who I’m e-mailing I’ll often remove the -j and put my name in (too be a bit more “formal”).

    I know lots of others who do the same.

  • http://wicked-styles.com/bitsandpieces/ Doc Rice

    I’ve come to the point where I don’t even use a signature when sending internal company e-mail to folks I normally interact with. None of that, “Hi John,” and ending with, “Thanks, Bob.” The formality feels unnecessary and artificial, plus it physically makes e-mail threads longer to parse.

    That said, I’d agree most would use initials as a short-hand because it’s easier. Sending something to an official contact outside the company would require the complete diplomatic package – full name, company logo and all.

  • http://wicked-styles.com/bitsandpieces/ Doc Rice

    I’ve come to the point where I don’t even use a signature when sending internal company e-mail to folks I normally interact with. None of that, “Hi John,” and ending with, “Thanks, Bob.” The formality feels unnecessary and artificial, plus it physically makes e-mail threads longer to parse.

    That said, I’d agree most would use initials as a short-hand because it’s easier. Sending something to an official contact outside the company would require the complete diplomatic package – full name, company logo and all.

  • Arthur Doohan

    A signature on a letter (along w the address) served to identify the sender – in an email that requirement is already fulfilled so unless ones email address is somehow obscure (dm25@hotmail.com) or not intuitable then “Daniel” conveys no extra info.

    Formality (manners, etiquette, customs) serve to smooth interactions between strangers – therefore the amount of formality indicates the lack of trust between two parties. Inapproriate formality creates barriers.

    But for you “DM” or “D” is way better than “drm”

    AD

  • Arthur Doohan

    A signature on a letter (along w the address) served to identify the sender – in an email that requirement is already fulfilled so unless ones email address is somehow obscure (dm25@hotmail.com) or not intuitable then “Daniel” conveys no extra info.

    Formality (manners, etiquette, customs) serve to smooth interactions between strangers – therefore the amount of formality indicates the lack of trust between two parties. Inapproriate formality creates barriers.

    But for you “DM” or “D” is way better than “drm”

    AD

  • http://dmiessler.com/ Daniel Miessler

    Interesting.

    So the general theme of the responses makes sense — add additional signature information as the formality of the message increases.

    Arthur, why is DM better than drm? Capitalization? Or the negative association with Digital Rights Management?

  • http://dmiessler.com Daniel Miessler

    Interesting.

    So the general theme of the responses makes sense — add additional signature information as the formality of the message increases.

    Arthur, why is DM better than drm? Capitalization? Or the negative association with Digital Rights Management?

  • http://stevengharms.com/ Steven G. Harms

    DM is better because he thinks you are either DangerMouse or DungeonMaster: either of which are inexpressably cool ( especially with the D&D 4.0 release later this month ).

    But to address the question there are indeed different standards of communication

    Hacker My name’s in the from field, my email address is in the from field, what’s the point of salutation? Just send the message and be done. Think of all the precious bits you slaughter with you antiquated formality (Lenin would have loved high-tech).

    Hacker trying to convince someone Adopt the formalities of Dear Blank / …Thomas J. Hacker

    Manager All formalities, all the time, unless talking to staff and using the non-countable address “Team:”.

    Middle-Manager Manager + Themed Graphic Stationary

    Senior Manager Middle-Manager plus photo in header bar

    Engineering Manager See Hacker

    CEO Someone else writes my emails for me.

  • http://stevengharms.com Steven G. Harms

    DM is better because he thinks you are either DangerMouse or DungeonMaster: either of which are inexpressably cool ( especially with the D&D 4.0 release later this month ).

    But to address the question there are indeed different standards of communication

    Hacker My name’s in the from field, my email address is in the from field, what’s the point of salutation? Just send the message and be done. Think of all the precious bits you slaughter with you antiquated formality (Lenin would have loved high-tech).

    Hacker trying to convince someone Adopt the formalities of Dear Blank / …Thomas J. Hacker

    Manager All formalities, all the time, unless talking to staff and using the non-countable address “Team:”.

    Middle-Manager Manager + Themed Graphic Stationary

    Senior Manager Middle-Manager plus photo in header bar

    Engineering Manager See Hacker

    CEO Someone else writes my emails for me.

  • http://stevengharms.com/ Steven G. Harms

    Agggggghhh. Need preview function for comments.

  • http://stevengharms.com Steven G. Harms

    Agggggghhh. Need preview function for comments.

  • http://markdudlik.com/ md

    I hope you didn’t think I was pompous when sending you emails!

    I use md as my signature and name for a lot of reasons.

    1. I hate my last name. Dudlik. Its terrible. (dud-lick. not dude-lick, but still bad)

    2. my website/email address show my name. Mark is common enough.

    3. md makes me seem like i might be a doctor. (kidding)

    I dont use all my initials because then i’d spell out mad.

    I think its just a shorthand that can simplify things. I will sign Mark on first time or more formal emails, usually.

    Ive been consistent enough with md that some people just call me that offline now too.

    What I would find more pompous is people who use their entire names (and have numbers)

    Thanks Mark Anthony Dudlik II

    (seriously, worst name ever)

  • http://markdudlik.com md

    I hope you didn’t think I was pompous when sending you emails!

    I use md as my signature and name for a lot of reasons.

    1. I hate my last name. Dudlik. Its terrible. (dud-lick. not dude-lick, but still bad)

    2. my website/email address show my name. Mark is common enough.

    3. md makes me seem like i might be a doctor. (kidding)

    I dont use all my initials because then i’d spell out mad.

    I think its just a shorthand that can simplify things. I will sign Mark on first time or more formal emails, usually.

    Ive been consistent enough with md that some people just call me that offline now too.

    What I would find more pompous is people who use their entire names (and have numbers)

    Thanks Mark Anthony Dudlik II

    (seriously, worst name ever)

  • Daniel Miessler

    LOL, nice comment, md.

  • Daniel Miessler

    LOL, nice comment, md.


Top

Popular

Information Security / Technology

Politics

Philosophy & Religion

Technology & Science

Culture & Society

Miscellaneous

Arguments

Projects

Collections

Twitter

What I'm Reading

Favorite Books and Essays

Top Blog Categories

Inputs