<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Self-Publishing &#8212; Not All Bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/self-publishing-not-all-bad/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/self-publishing-not-all-bad</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:30:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/self-publishing-not-all-bad/comment-page-1#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/271#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Self-publishing is no worse or better than going through a traditional publishing house.  The goal, either way, is to sell a ton of books, and neither method offers a garuntee of doing so.
The stigma with self-publication stems from the idea that &quot;this wasn&#039;t good enough to be accepted by a publishing house, so I put it out myself in my own vanity.&quot;
Often, that&#039;s very true.  Also, many traditonally published books suck, too.
The methods are equal, ultimately.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self-publishing is no worse or better than going through a traditional publishing house.  The goal, either way, is to sell a ton of books, and neither method offers a garuntee of doing so.
The stigma with self-publication stems from the idea that &#8220;this wasn&#8217;t good enough to be accepted by a publishing house, so I put it out myself in my own vanity.&#8221;
Often, that&#8217;s very true.  Also, many traditonally published books suck, too.
The methods are equal, ultimately.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
