<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Port Mirroring on a Cisco 3550 Switch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch/comment-page-1#comment-104741</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch#comment-104741</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, guys. The place I implemented this had very little traffic on each port, and even then I realize it&#039;s not ideal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem is that I need to monitor this &lt;em&gt;network&lt;/em&gt;, not just a particular port. At the same client I have a number of taps in place (permanent fixtures that I had them buy) to facilitate ongoing traffic monitoring. I do recognize that this method is superior; it&#039;s just that it doesn&#039;t let you monitor everything on a low-traffic switch like a span does.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem with the span, of course, is that at any time one or more of the ports being monitored could become NOT low-traffic, at which point the solution falls apart.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At any rate, the post was for remembering syntax for the monitor command more than anything. Good discussion, though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, guys. The place I implemented this had very little traffic on each port, and even then I realize it&#8217;s not ideal.</p>

<p>The problem is that I need to monitor this <em>network</em>, not just a particular port. At the same client I have a number of taps in place (permanent fixtures that I had them buy) to facilitate ongoing traffic monitoring. I do recognize that this method is superior; it&#8217;s just that it doesn&#8217;t let you monitor everything on a low-traffic switch like a span does.</p>

<p>The problem with the span, of course, is that at any time one or more of the ports being monitored could become NOT low-traffic, at which point the solution falls apart.</p>

<p>At any rate, the post was for remembering syntax for the monitor command more than anything. Good discussion, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch/comment-page-1#comment-250443</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch#comment-250443</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, guys. The place I implemented this had very little traffic on each port, and even then I realize it&#039;s not ideal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem is that I need to monitor this &lt;em&gt;network&lt;/em&gt;, not just a particular port. At the same client I have a number of taps in place (permanent fixtures that I had them buy) to facilitate ongoing traffic monitoring. I do recognize that this method is superior; it&#039;s just that it doesn&#039;t let you monitor everything on a low-traffic switch like a span does.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem with the span, of course, is that at any time one or more of the ports being monitored could become NOT low-traffic, at which point the solution falls apart.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At any rate, the post was for remembering syntax for the monitor command more than anything. Good discussion, though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, guys. The place I implemented this had very little traffic on each port, and even then I realize it&#8217;s not ideal.</p>

<p>The problem is that I need to monitor this <em>network</em>, not just a particular port. At the same client I have a number of taps in place (permanent fixtures that I had them buy) to facilitate ongoing traffic monitoring. I do recognize that this method is superior; it&#8217;s just that it doesn&#8217;t let you monitor everything on a low-traffic switch like a span does.</p>

<p>The problem with the span, of course, is that at any time one or more of the ports being monitored could become NOT low-traffic, at which point the solution falls apart.</p>

<p>At any rate, the post was for remembering syntax for the monitor command more than anything. Good discussion, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxo</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch/comment-page-1#comment-104732</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch#comment-104732</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I took the CCNA 1-4 (class, not the actual test.)  As much as I love networking, that class let me know that I should not pursue a career in it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took the CCNA 1-4 (class, not the actual test.)  As much as I love networking, that class let me know that I should not pursue a career in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxo</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch/comment-page-1#comment-250442</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch#comment-250442</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I took the CCNA 1-4 (class, not the actual test.)  As much as I love networking, that class let me know that I should not pursue a career in it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took the CCNA 1-4 (class, not the actual test.)  As much as I love networking, that class let me know that I should not pursue a career in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saul Lethbridge</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch/comment-page-1#comment-104673</link>
		<dc:creator>Saul Lethbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch#comment-104673</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I know this is just a reference, but I personally would be very concerned with sending more than a few Fa ports out a single Gi port, considering aggregate traffic. 4 fully saturated Fa ports = 800 Mb.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The tao article above is also something to consider, very good info.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is just a reference, but I personally would be very concerned with sending more than a few Fa ports out a single Gi port, considering aggregate traffic. 4 fully saturated Fa ports = 800 Mb.</p>

<p>The tao article above is also something to consider, very good info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saul Lethbridge</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch/comment-page-1#comment-250441</link>
		<dc:creator>Saul Lethbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch#comment-250441</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I know this is just a reference, but I personally would be very concerned with sending more than a few Fa ports out a single Gi port, considering aggregate traffic. 4 fully saturated Fa ports = 800 Mb.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The tao article above is also something to consider, very good info.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is just a reference, but I personally would be very concerned with sending more than a few Fa ports out a single Gi port, considering aggregate traffic. 4 fully saturated Fa ports = 800 Mb.</p>

<p>The tao article above is also something to consider, very good info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghost16825</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch/comment-page-1#comment-104666</link>
		<dc:creator>ghost16825</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch#comment-104666</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Also fyi:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2007/12/expert-commentary-on-span-and-rspan.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also fyi:</p>

<p><a href="http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2007/12/expert-commentary-on-span-and-rspan.html" rel="nofollow">http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2007/12/expert-commentary-on-span-and-rspan.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghost16825</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch/comment-page-1#comment-250440</link>
		<dc:creator>ghost16825</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch#comment-250440</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Also fyi:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2007/12/expert-commentary-on-span-and-rspan.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also fyi:</p>

<p><a href="http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2007/12/expert-commentary-on-span-and-rspan.html" rel="nofollow">http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2007/12/expert-commentary-on-span-and-rspan.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saul Lethbridge</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch/comment-page-1#comment-104565</link>
		<dc:creator>Saul Lethbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch#comment-104565</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;4 Fa ports going out 1 Fa port...any dropped packets!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 Fa ports going out 1 Fa port&#8230;any dropped packets!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saul Lethbridge</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch/comment-page-1#comment-250439</link>
		<dc:creator>Saul Lethbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/port-mirroring-on-a-cisco-3550-switch#comment-250439</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;4 Fa ports going out 1 Fa port...any dropped packets!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 Fa ports going out 1 Fa port&#8230;any dropped packets!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

