Outrageous Beliefs Are NOT Equal to Claims They Are Preposterous

By Daniel Miessler on February 2nd, 2008: Tagged as Atheism | Religion
  • Well thats really great if we can celebrate these and spread awareness so that people who are not having it can try to avoid it and who have it can go for the regular check ups and be aware of the consequences. I would say this is the great initiative in order to share this.
  • Colette

    Belief has nothing to do with Truth. I can believe that gravity doesn't exist. I can believe I can jump off the Empire State Building and fly. The Truth is, I can't, no matter what I believe.


    So, Truth is Truth, whether I believe it or not.


    The more I learn, the more I realize there is so much I don't know and can't understand ....

  • Jacob Kline

    Not that this comment concludes the discussion, but you left out one element in your illustration.
    To complete it, lets suppose the wacko in your excursion is asked how in crap he came up with his ideas, and he claims he got his 'knowledge' from some book of his. That would be analogous to a 'believer' with his Bible or Koran, do you agree?
    Well, if I was the second hiker, I'd ask to see the book. I would want to evaluate its claims, and see if it was a trustworthy source. I think this is what must also be done in the case of your religious friends and their questionable beliefs. That is, (if you do wish to evaluate those beliefs,) you would evaluate the trustworthiness of the source that they are claiming.

  • @Ravi


    Thank you. Fixed. I knew that. :(


    @Carl


    I strongly suggest you read what Sam Harris has to say on this topic. I won't do it justice, but the concept is pretty simple: a culture of supporting those who believe in fantasy -- even "harmless" fantasy -- casts a layer of protection on those who believe fantasies that are NOT harmless.


    In other words, once we say as a society that it's ok to believe in things that aren't real, we introduce a serious problem. We then limit our ability to criticize even the dangerous beliefs, and this is something we see today. So it's not benign, ultimately, to support such "benign" fantastical beliefs. They have a propensity to become more extreme over time, with very negative consequences.


    So I reject that it can be done long term without deteriorating into something negative. I think the natural evolution of civilization leads to it dying off.

  • Ravi

    Hindi is the language, Hindu is a person that practices Hinduism

  • Carl M

    Of course. But, it's only worth arguing when harm comes from the beliefs.

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

twitter_icon

Sample Original Content


Information Security

Tutorials and Primers

Culture & Society

Technology & Science

Politics

Philosophy & Religion

Miscellaneous

Tools & Projects


Blog Archives