Lifecasting: What It Is and How It Will Change Society

By Daniel Miessler on May 12th, 2008: Tagged as Internet | Privacy | Technology
  • All of this as an idea = intensely interesting. Even a little exciting.
    But,
    most of us lead lives unsuitable for spectators. Too boring to watch.
    And,
    You're giving no credit to the legal profession!!
    On top of that, consider who writes the laws - people who cannot afford to have their very human behaviour captured on video and broadcast to the world. Consider Mark Sanford's case.
    We'll see more and more of these, but a more severe backlash by very powerful people to prevent THEIR lives from getting too public.

    It may turn out to be more financially astute to just leave the camera turned off except in emergency.

    Either way, we will see what happens. (heh heh)
  • The entire world will NEVER collectively participate in such a comprehensive level of lifecasting. This would not only call for people to completely throw all of their privacy out the window, but they'll also have to wear a friggin' camera everywhere they go. It'll never happen. I don't care how connected the coming generations will be; everyone in the world will never make their ENTIRE life a 24/7/365 reality show.


    With that said, I do believe that more people will independently produce their own reality programs about their life, but that group will be small in size - and even they won't clip a camera under their chin to document their EVERY MOMENT.


    But please don't get me wrong... I'm right there with you in the idea about reality programming being more prominent on the web. Actually, I believe it will happen so much that I'm in the business of producing for public figures an online reality program about their life. I've written a little bit about my perspective on this topic on a blog that I've periodically updated. Here's the link...


    http://www.IAmGHOSTBLOGGER.com


    I'm sorry to seem like I totally disagree with your perspective - I'm actually right there with you on so much of what you've said. All in all, this has been a great article ;-)


  • <ol>
    <li>All phone carriers will start supporting all-you-can-eat data plans, and they’ll get much cheaper. 2. The bandwidth (both download and upload) on said services will increase very rapidly, e.g. the next network upgrade after 3G is going to be scary fast (try between 100-300Mb). 3. All mobile phones are going to do video, and they will all ride these newer, faster networks. 4. Within the next ten years a significant percentage of people in first-world countries are going to be broadcasting every moment of their waking lives (and in many cases their sleeping lives as well). Lol, this is total bs</li>
    </ol>
  • The difference between this and Orwell's surveillance is that we the people will be doing the surveillance, and then uploading it to Google to be parsed into chunks, translated to text, put into multiple languages, and then made searchable via folksonomies.


    So they don't have to do the V for Vendetta cameras like the U.K.; they just let US do the capturing and uploading. Then the government walk into Google and say, "Nice. Now give us what you have on all of your incoming casts."

  • Jason Powell

    "I have even been called “honkeys” at a Burger King in South Georgia."


    In all fairness, I am, in fact, a honkey.

  • The revolution will be televised :)


    Nice overview article. Well thought out. You've seemed to focus on mostly negative issues though.


    When you go to the mall now and and see everyone walking around talking to people on their cellphones, that are likely in a different mall, it's not hard to imagine a world where you jump from "place to place" from your mobile looking at what your friends are casting.


    That's probably the key though, most people are probably going to point the camera away form them at what they are looking at and not at theirselves, so yeah, you'll be on someone elses lifecast, but they won't know who you are, you won't get tagged, and everyone will be so self involved they won't have much time to watch your life, because frankly "your life" (in the general sense) isn't that interesting.


    Most people don't read other people's blogs, and they're not likely to watch too many other peoples lifecasts either, becasue they won't have the time, they'll be way too much video of "interesting" people to keep up with to bother stalking the local food court.


    Anonymity for the most part will be in the sheer overwhelming volume of data out there. Sure if something remarkable happens it'll be online quickly, but that's already the case for the most part, and things are fine. It's all going to be ok I think. We're just going from 500 channels to 5 billion channels is all.

  • It's all true and this is exactly what the future predict us
    With all that, mobilenob real time video converter is exactly what you describe here.


    MobileNOB 'send to mobile' button will allowed the service you present in your blog. Allowing Web Video Portals to implement a small script in their website ('send to mobile') that will allow users to send every video from the website to their mobile handsets in real time, all on the FLY. Its support more than 500 different mobile video formats that will bring best end user screening experience when watching the video on their handset.
    Beside the fact as you said that Operators will introduce Data packages for end users, video portal website owners can generate profit from the service and make their videos on the web profitable, by making them downloadable for mobile
    www.mobilenob.com</p>

  • Eliezer

    All too true, and all too likely. Apparently, you never read George Orwell's 1984. This idea is the basis of a major part of the totalitarian regime's ability to control the populace - constant surveilance. The web just makes it easier.


    I have little doubt that there are serious efforts by all types of government and non-government organizations to get to this state.


    It will be interesting to see how first amendment protection will be used. What do you do if a Chinese tourist lifecasts something in Des Moines to a Tanzanian website? Can the person who's privacy was violated sue or do anything to protect himself? Who's jurisdiction?

  • Honestly? I think you took the thoughts and words right out of my mouth. I often find myself trying to explain to the world what is coming to them in terms of lifecasting and many other things. Although I think some of your observations are a little exaggerated for even 5-10 years, I do believe what you may have exaggerated there are also things you have undersold. You are very in-tune to what is going on and I almost completely agree with you. Thanks for putting your thoughts all in one place. This is GREAT stuff. I will now become a faithful reader of yours because you think just like me. lol.


    Quit doing so much crack, take a deep breathe and smoke a joint maybe?


    Just kidding!


    <ul>
    <li>webaddict</li>
    </ul>
  • Basically the playing field changes from having advantage by controlling information to having advantage by knowing what information is important and what isn't.


    I suggest you read "Snowcrash" by Neal Stephenson, where the "hero" turns himself into what's called in the book a "gargoyle". Won't spoil it for you by telling you what it is.


    -- Arik

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

twitter_icon

Sample Original Content


Information Security

Tutorials and Primers

Culture & Society

Technology & Science

Politics

Philosophy & Religion

Miscellaneous

Tools & Projects


Blog Archives