<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jon Stewart Owns Jim Cramer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/jon-stewart-owns-jim-cramer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/jon-stewart-owns-jim-cramer</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dale</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/jon-stewart-owns-jim-cramer/comment-page-1#comment-242096</link>
		<dc:creator>dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/jon-stewart-owns-jim-cramer#comment-242096</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It was more of a sucker punch but Cramer should have known what he was getting into. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stewart really should stick to comedy and stop trying to be serious because he gets pwned all the time when he&#039;s up against someone who can actually debate the topic at hand.  Of course, Stewart&#039;s serious question that gets a serious response from the guest gets interrupted by Stewart with a joke and then he throws another serious question at the guest.  It&#039;s just like the hearing in congress where they just want airtime or to belittle the person/group they brought in.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was more of a sucker punch but Cramer should have known what he was getting into. <br /><br />Stewart really should stick to comedy and stop trying to be serious because he gets pwned all the time when he&#39;s up against someone who can actually debate the topic at hand.  Of course, Stewart&#39;s serious question that gets a serious response from the guest gets interrupted by Stewart with a joke and then he throws another serious question at the guest.  It&#39;s just like the hearing in congress where they just want airtime or to belittle the person/group they brought in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dylan</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/jon-stewart-owns-jim-cramer/comment-page-1#comment-242095</link>
		<dc:creator>dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/jon-stewart-owns-jim-cramer#comment-242095</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You know, part of me felt sorry for the guy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, part of me felt sorry for the guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dale</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/jon-stewart-owns-jim-cramer/comment-page-1#comment-240937</link>
		<dc:creator>dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/jon-stewart-owns-jim-cramer#comment-240937</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It was more of a sucker punch but Cramer should have known what he was getting into. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stewart really should stick to comedy and stop trying to be serious because he gets pwned all the time when he&#039;s up against someone who can actually debate the topic at hand.  Of course, Stewart&#039;s serious question that gets a serious response from the guest gets interrupted by Stewart with a joke and then he throws another serious question at the guest.  It&#039;s just like the hearing in congress where they just want airtime or to belittle the person/group they brought in.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was more of a sucker punch but Cramer should have known what he was getting into. <br /><br />Stewart really should stick to comedy and stop trying to be serious because he gets pwned all the time when he&#39;s up against someone who can actually debate the topic at hand.  Of course, Stewart&#39;s serious question that gets a serious response from the guest gets interrupted by Stewart with a joke and then he throws another serious question at the guest.  It&#39;s just like the hearing in congress where they just want airtime or to belittle the person/group they brought in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dylan</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/jon-stewart-owns-jim-cramer/comment-page-1#comment-240936</link>
		<dc:creator>dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/jon-stewart-owns-jim-cramer#comment-240936</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You know, part of me felt sorry for the guy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, part of me felt sorry for the guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

