<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe Biden Voted FOR the War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/joe-biden-voted-for-the-war/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/joe-biden-voted-for-the-war</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:44:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxo</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/joe-biden-voted-for-the-war/comment-page-1#comment-186195</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/joe-biden-voted-for-the-war#comment-186195</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Michael Moore put it best a few weeks ago:
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=226
The media is reporting that Senator Obama has narrowed his alternatives to three men: Joe Biden, Evan Bayh and Tim Kaine. They&#039;re all decent fellows, but they are far from the core of what the Obama campaign has been about: Change. Real change. Out with the old. And don&#039;t invade countries that pose no threat to us.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Senators Biden and Bayh voted for that invasion and that war, the war Barack ran against, the war Barack reminded us was the big difference between him and Senator Clinton because she voted for the war and he spoke out against it while running for Senate (a brave and bold thing to do back in 2002).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For Obama to place either of these senators on the ticket would be a huge blow to the millions that chose him in the primaries over Hillary. He will undercut one of the strongest advantages he has over the Hundred-Year War senator, Mr. McCain. By anointing a VP who did what McCain did in throwing us into this war, Mr. Obama will lose the moral high ground in the debates.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Moore put it best a few weeks ago:
<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=226" rel="nofollow">http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=226</a>
The media is reporting that Senator Obama has narrowed his alternatives to three men: Joe Biden, Evan Bayh and Tim Kaine. They&#8217;re all decent fellows, but they are far from the core of what the Obama campaign has been about: Change. Real change. Out with the old. And don&#8217;t invade countries that pose no threat to us.</p>

<p>Senators Biden and Bayh voted for that invasion and that war, the war Barack ran against, the war Barack reminded us was the big difference between him and Senator Clinton because she voted for the war and he spoke out against it while running for Senate (a brave and bold thing to do back in 2002).</p>

<p>For Obama to place either of these senators on the ticket would be a huge blow to the millions that chose him in the primaries over Hillary. He will undercut one of the strongest advantages he has over the Hundred-Year War senator, Mr. McCain. By anointing a VP who did what McCain did in throwing us into this war, Mr. Obama will lose the moral high ground in the debates.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxo</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/joe-biden-voted-for-the-war/comment-page-1#comment-252637</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/joe-biden-voted-for-the-war#comment-252637</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Michael Moore put it best a few weeks ago:
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=226
The media is reporting that Senator Obama has narrowed his alternatives to three men: Joe Biden, Evan Bayh and Tim Kaine. They&#039;re all decent fellows, but they are far from the core of what the Obama campaign has been about: Change. Real change. Out with the old. And don&#039;t invade countries that pose no threat to us.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Senators Biden and Bayh voted for that invasion and that war, the war Barack ran against, the war Barack reminded us was the big difference between him and Senator Clinton because she voted for the war and he spoke out against it while running for Senate (a brave and bold thing to do back in 2002).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For Obama to place either of these senators on the ticket would be a huge blow to the millions that chose him in the primaries over Hillary. He will undercut one of the strongest advantages he has over the Hundred-Year War senator, Mr. McCain. By anointing a VP who did what McCain did in throwing us into this war, Mr. Obama will lose the moral high ground in the debates.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Moore put it best a few weeks ago:
<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=226" rel="nofollow">http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=226</a>
The media is reporting that Senator Obama has narrowed his alternatives to three men: Joe Biden, Evan Bayh and Tim Kaine. They&#8217;re all decent fellows, but they are far from the core of what the Obama campaign has been about: Change. Real change. Out with the old. And don&#8217;t invade countries that pose no threat to us.</p>

<p>Senators Biden and Bayh voted for that invasion and that war, the war Barack ran against, the war Barack reminded us was the big difference between him and Senator Clinton because she voted for the war and he spoke out against it while running for Senate (a brave and bold thing to do back in 2002).</p>

<p>For Obama to place either of these senators on the ticket would be a huge blow to the millions that chose him in the primaries over Hillary. He will undercut one of the strongest advantages he has over the Hundred-Year War senator, Mr. McCain. By anointing a VP who did what McCain did in throwing us into this war, Mr. Obama will lose the moral high ground in the debates.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

