<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Time to Drop the &#8220;www&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:30:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-241886</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-241886</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Some domains might have multiple websites physically hosted on separate servers.  For example:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mysite.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.mysite.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.mysite.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wiki.mysite.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.mysite.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;forum.mysite.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They all use the same protocol, HTTP, so there would still need to be some other distinction to identify which machine any particular request is actually referring to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In this case, I suppose the bare string &quot;mysite.com&quot; could be treated as a synonym for one of the three depending on their relative popularity, and traffic could be rerouted accordingly.  But the other two servers would have to retain their individual unique names.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some domains might have multiple websites physically hosted on separate servers.  For example:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.mysite.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysite.com</a><br /><a href="http://wiki.mysite.com" rel="nofollow">wiki.mysite.com</a><br /><a href="http://forum.mysite.com" rel="nofollow">forum.mysite.com</a><br /><br />They all use the same protocol, HTTP, so there would still need to be some other distinction to identify which machine any particular request is actually referring to.<br /><br />In this case, I suppose the bare string &#8220;mysite.com&#8221; could be treated as a synonym for one of the three depending on their relative popularity, and traffic could be rerouted accordingly.  But the other two servers would have to retain their individual unique names.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-241004</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-241004</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Some domains might have multiple websites physically hosted on separate servers.  For example:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mysite.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.mysite.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.mysite.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wiki.mysite.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.mysite.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;forum.mysite.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They all use the same protocol, HTTP, so there would still need to be some other distinction to identify which machine any particular request is actually referring to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In this case, I suppose the bare string &quot;mysite.com&quot; could be treated as a synonym for one of the three depending on their relative popularity, and traffic could be rerouted accordingly.  But the other two servers would have to retain their individual unique names.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some domains might have multiple websites physically hosted on separate servers.  For example:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.mysite.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysite.com</a><br /><a href="http://wiki.mysite.com" rel="nofollow">wiki.mysite.com</a><br /><a href="http://forum.mysite.com" rel="nofollow">forum.mysite.com</a><br /><br />They all use the same protocol, HTTP, so there would still need to be some other distinction to identify which machine any particular request is actually referring to.<br /><br />In this case, I suppose the bare string &#8220;mysite.com&#8221; could be treated as a synonym for one of the three depending on their relative popularity, and traffic could be rerouted accordingly.  But the other two servers would have to retain their individual unique names.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Design Chester</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-213245</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Design Chester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-213245</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;An interesting topic of discussion here. I agree with &quot;PC Pete&quot; in the fact that using the &quot;www&quot; in print makes it clear that a website is being referenced. The thing that still amazes me is that most people still type a web address into a search bar instead of a the browsers address bar!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting topic of discussion here. I agree with &#8220;PC Pete&#8221; in the fact that using the &#8220;www&#8221; in print makes it clear that a website is being referenced. The thing that still amazes me is that most people still type a web address into a search bar instead of a the browsers address bar!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How-To: Install Wordpress on a GoDaddy Linux Virtual Dedicated Server &#124; New York Information Systems Inc.</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-208199</link>
		<dc:creator>How-To: Install Wordpress on a GoDaddy Linux Virtual Dedicated Server &#124; New York Information Systems Inc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-208199</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] &#8220;www.yourdomain.com&#8221; will be redirected to &#8220;yourdomain.com&#8221;. There is some controversy on whether or not to use &#8220;www.&#8221; anymore, but despite the controversy, we recommend using &#8220;www.&#8221; anyway unless you have a [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;www.yourdomain.com&#8221; will be redirected to &#8220;yourdomain.com&#8221;. There is some controversy on whether or not to use &#8220;www.&#8221; anymore, but despite the controversy, we recommend using &#8220;www.&#8221; anyway unless you have a [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dropping the WWW - ShiftEleven</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-112693</link>
		<dc:creator>Dropping the WWW - ShiftEleven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-112693</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] did this a while back, but I thought I would mention it now: I have dropped the www from ShiftEleven. This came about from a discussion I had with Jason. He proposed the important [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] did this a while back, but I thought I would mention it now: I have dropped the www from ShiftEleven. This came about from a discussion I had with Jason. He proposed the important [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-76273</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-76273</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just get everyone to stop saying &quot;double-U&quot; three times and make up a new word for it, or we could say &quot;triple-double-u&quot; at only five syllables (Nearly a 50% savings!) or &quot;six-u&quot;; that&#039;s only two syllables (Over 75% OFF!)  Seriously, what do we do about those who insist on typing www-dot in front of every address even when you don&#039;t say it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just get everyone to stop saying &#8220;double-U&#8221; three times and make up a new word for it, or we could say &#8220;triple-double-u&#8221; at only five syllables (Nearly a 50% savings!) or &#8220;six-u&#8221;; that&#8217;s only two syllables (Over 75% OFF!)  Seriously, what do we do about those who insist on typing www-dot in front of every address even when you don&#8217;t say it?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La pronunciación de WWW</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-74596</link>
		<dc:creator>La pronunciación de WWW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 04:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-74596</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] eso apoyo la iniciativa de eliminar las www de la direcciones web y coincido con Douglas [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] eso apoyo la iniciativa de eliminar las www de la direcciones web y coincido con Douglas [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-74523</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-74523</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I recommend using uuuuuu instead of www.  The existence of a &quot;w&quot; has peeved me forever.  I mean, we don&#039;t have a &quot;double-o&quot; or a &quot;double-e&quot;, right?  Just how hard is it to continue to hold the key down, anyway?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend using uuuuuu instead of www.  The existence of a &#8220;w&#8221; has peeved me forever.  I mean, we don&#8217;t have a &#8220;double-o&#8221; or a &#8220;double-e&#8221;, right?  Just how hard is it to continue to hold the key down, anyway?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-74477</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-74477</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have to agree with this story. It is perhaps time to drop the &quot;www&quot; prefix to domain name, as they simply serves not much of a purpose. I have started trimming off the www on some of my sites, and I find that they work equally well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, it is best to careful when switching from a &quot;www&quot; domain to a non-www domain name, as it may temporarily result in a loss of traffic and page indexing on search engine. It has to be done with extra care. You definitely will not want to result in loss of traffic.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with this story. It is perhaps time to drop the &#8220;www&#8221; prefix to domain name, as they simply serves not much of a purpose. I have started trimming off the www on some of my sites, and I find that they work equally well.</p>

<p>However, it is best to careful when switching from a &#8220;www&#8221; domain to a non-www domain name, as it may temporarily result in a loss of traffic and page indexing on search engine. It has to be done with extra care. You definitely will not want to result in loss of traffic.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It’s Time to Drop the “www” &#171; fugit irreparabile tempus</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-74334</link>
		<dc:creator>It’s Time to Drop the “www” &#171; fugit irreparabile tempus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 02:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-74334</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greetings New Subscribers &#124; dmiessler.com</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73934</link>
		<dc:creator>Greetings New Subscribers &#124; dmiessler.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73934</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] of you who&#8217;ve recently subscribed to my feed have likely come either for my no-www article or my piece about the nice guy paradox. I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed those, and welcome to the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of you who&#8217;ve recently subscribed to my feed have likely come either for my no-www article or my piece about the nice guy paradox. I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed those, and welcome to the [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phill Price &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why we need www</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73848</link>
		<dc:creator>Phill Price &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why we need www</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73848</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Miessler recently posted that we need to lose the www [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Miessler recently posted that we need to lose the www [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73648</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73648</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Bear&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It doesn&#039;t shoot down the idea. As I said in the piece, the concept isn&#039;t to abolish hostnames -- only to point the root of the domain to the main web content. And by the way, you can just do the same with your setup as well. Send the external DNS queries to your internal DNS server, and point the root to the IP address of your web content. This isn&#039;t a discussion of eliminating options -- just changing default behavior.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But the purpose is not to say what&#039;s best for everyone, but rather what&#039;s best for the Internet and its users in general.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bear</p>

<p>It doesn&#8217;t shoot down the idea. As I said in the piece, the concept isn&#8217;t to abolish hostnames &#8212; only to point the root of the domain to the main web content. And by the way, you can just do the same with your setup as well. Send the external DNS queries to your internal DNS server, and point the root to the IP address of your web content. This isn&#8217;t a discussion of eliminating options &#8212; just changing default behavior.</p>

<p>But the purpose is not to say what&#8217;s best for everyone, but rather what&#8217;s best for the Internet and its users in general.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bear</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73647</link>
		<dc:creator>Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73647</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oops. I see my comment above doesn&#039;t read very well because I didn&#039;t think and used characters that were interpreted as invalid html tags and were dropped.  I should have used something like [mydomain] instead of (open chevron)mydomain(close chevron).  (whatever). should have been (whatever).[mydomain] and www. should have been www.[mydomain].
Sorry about that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops. I see my comment above doesn&#8217;t read very well because I didn&#8217;t think and used characters that were interpreted as invalid html tags and were dropped.  I should have used something like [mydomain] instead of (open chevron)mydomain(close chevron).  (whatever). should have been (whatever).[mydomain] and www. should have been <a href="http://www.mydomain" rel="nofollow">http://www.mydomain</a>.
Sorry about that.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bear</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73646</link>
		<dc:creator>Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73646</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, the www performs a real and useful purpose for me.  I have my own internal network with multiple systems.  I have a gateway with a single static ip address that is visible to the internet.  My router port maps various incoming connections to specific different machines on my internal network (http, smtp, etc.)  I also have my own DNS servers.  On my internal network, my dns servers map  (whatever). to my specific internal ip addresses that are not visible to the outside world, but the map (for example) www., mail., smtp. etc. to my public static ip address.  So, a dns lookup that just specifies  will resolve to one of my internal network addresses, none of which are directly reachable from the public internet, while a dns query for www. will resolve to my public address - reachable from the outside world.  I think this shoots down the idea that the www. prefix serves no purpose and isn&#039;t needed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the www performs a real and useful purpose for me.  I have my own internal network with multiple systems.  I have a gateway with a single static ip address that is visible to the internet.  My router port maps various incoming connections to specific different machines on my internal network (http, smtp, etc.)  I also have my own DNS servers.  On my internal network, my dns servers map  (whatever). to my specific internal ip addresses that are not visible to the outside world, but the map (for example) <a href="http://www." rel="nofollow">http://www.</a>, mail., smtp. etc. to my public static ip address.  So, a dns lookup that just specifies  will resolve to one of my internal network addresses, none of which are directly reachable from the public internet, while a dns query for www. will resolve to my public address &#8211; reachable from the outside world.  I think this shoots down the idea that the www. prefix serves no purpose and isn&#8217;t needed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delightfully dorky&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Drop It</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73585</link>
		<dc:creator>delightfully dorky&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Drop It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73585</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] site on my part when I registered the domains, but they all redirect to www. There is a move to drop the www on all websites because it is seen as supercilious, not to mention it takes nine slabs to pronounce [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] site on my part when I registered the domains, but they all redirect to www. There is a move to drop the www on all websites because it is seen as supercilious, not to mention it takes nine slabs to pronounce [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jefflundberg.com/blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Time to Drop the &#8220;www&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73565</link>
		<dc:creator>jefflundberg.com/blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Time to Drop the &#8220;www&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73565</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] read more &#183; digg story [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more &middot; digg story [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raaaaaaaa! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; One TLD to rule them all&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73540</link>
		<dc:creator>raaaaaaaa! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; One TLD to rule them all&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73540</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] of the www.. If you spend just a few minutes a day browsing, you hardly type these anymore. Some wrote about it, and even started a movement. So we came from http://www.apple.com to apple.com. Now, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the <a href="http://www." rel="nofollow">http://www.</a>. If you spend just a few minutes a day browsing, you hardly type these anymore. Some wrote about it, and even started a movement. So we came from <a href="http://www.apple.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com</a> to apple.com. Now, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elend</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73521</link>
		<dc:creator>elend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 10:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73521</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is not true that www is totally useless. Here is an exemple:
Try http://mms.t-mobile.de and then http://www.mms.t-mobile.de. See any difference ?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not true that www is totally useless. Here is an exemple:
Try <a href="http://mms.t-mobile.de" rel="nofollow">http://mms.t-mobile.de</a> and then <a href="http://www.mms.t-mobile.de" rel="nofollow">http://www.mms.t-mobile.de</a>. See any difference ?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Guertin</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73463</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Guertin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73463</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ahh but there&#039;s a bit of a problem with this ... what happens when the site that people really need to go to is say, http://test.example.com ... well of course people type in www.test.example.com and tell you that the URL you have given them doesn&#039;t work.  I routinely add www. in front of all my third level domains that need public access to prevent many such emails like &quot;You&#039;re site doesn&#039;t work&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While I agree with this in theory it&#039;s going to be an uphill battle.  It&#039;s like people saying Kleenex instead of tissue ... it wasn&#039;t nipped in the bud early enough.  You&#039;d be amazed (or maybe not) at how many people think that a site address is not correct if it doesn&#039;t have www. in front of it and that&#039;s going to be a tough one to get out there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lastly if you have your www third level domain pointing at your main top level domain, what&#039;s the point of this excercise?  To save the unwashed masses from having to type www. ?  Anyone who cares about SEO at all will have both addresses land at the same place with mod_rewrite or something similar, so again, what&#039;s the point of this .. considering that more often than ot people will redirect blah.com to www.blah.com ...  which completely undoes this whole movement.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh but there&#8217;s a bit of a problem with this &#8230; what happens when the site that people really need to go to is say, <a href="http://test.example.com" rel="nofollow">http://test.example.com</a> &#8230; well of course people type in <a href="http://www.test.example.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.test.example.com</a> and tell you that the URL you have given them doesn&#8217;t work.  I routinely add www. in front of all my third level domains that need public access to prevent many such emails like &#8220;You&#8217;re site doesn&#8217;t work&#8221;</p>

<p>While I agree with this in theory it&#8217;s going to be an uphill battle.  It&#8217;s like people saying Kleenex instead of tissue &#8230; it wasn&#8217;t nipped in the bud early enough.  You&#8217;d be amazed (or maybe not) at how many people think that a site address is not correct if it doesn&#8217;t have www. in front of it and that&#8217;s going to be a tough one to get out there.</p>

<p>Lastly if you have your www third level domain pointing at your main top level domain, what&#8217;s the point of this excercise?  To save the unwashed masses from having to type www. ?  Anyone who cares about SEO at all will have both addresses land at the same place with mod_rewrite or something similar, so again, what&#8217;s the point of this .. considering that more often than ot people will redirect blah.com to <a href="http://www.blah.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blah.com</a> &#8230;  which completely undoes this whole movement.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nežinau.lt</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73444</link>
		<dc:creator>nežinau.lt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73444</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] kurie tinklaraščių autoriai agituoja atsisakyti „www“ priešdėlio interneto adresuose. Taip juos paprasčiau ir lengviau būtų įsiminti, pasakyti balsu (kaip sakote – vėvėvė ar [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kurie tinklaraščių autoriai agituoja atsisakyti „www“ priešdėlio interneto adresuose. Taip juos paprasčiau ir lengviau būtų įsiminti, pasakyti balsu (kaip sakote – vėvėvė ar [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It’s Time to Drop the “www” &#124; Dig Union</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73384</link>
		<dc:creator>It’s Time to Drop the “www” &#124; Dig Union</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73384</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Dig from:Here [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dig from:Here [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas anderson</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73383</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73383</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;who types www? nobody. just type the name of the domain eg. hotmail, then hit ctrl enter. it does the www and .com for you.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who types www? nobody. just type the name of the domain eg. hotmail, then hit ctrl enter. it does the www and .com for you.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jefflundberg.com/blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It’s Time to Drop the &#8220;www&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73371</link>
		<dc:creator>jefflundberg.com/blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It’s Time to Drop the &#8220;www&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73371</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: subcorpus</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/its-time-to-drop-the-www/comment-page-3#comment-73364</link>
		<dc:creator>subcorpus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/1471#comment-73364</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;www ...
its just a bit harder to say ...
not hard to write or type ...
so its Ok for me ...
i seldom tell people my address aloud ...
i text it ... email it ... or IM it ...
no trouble at all ...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>www &#8230;
its just a bit harder to say &#8230;
not hard to write or type &#8230;
so its Ok for me &#8230;
i seldom tell people my address aloud &#8230;
i text it &#8230; email it &#8230; or IM it &#8230;
no trouble at all &#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
