Is It Wrong to Have Children?

By Daniel Miessler on December 13th, 2007: Tagged as Philosophy | Society
  • moscarda

    you didnt mention things like the fear one has in bringing another kid into a collapsing civilisation where there may not be food or clean water or energy, and the guilt a parent would feel from that. not to mention a child born in the western world consumes four-times the food/resources than the other two-thirds of humanity. however i do believe the desire to have children is instinctual, as well as wanting to share in the joy of childbirth and love for a child and the love returned.

    • aristotle

      don’t be an uncritical tard

  • moscarda

    you didnt mention things like the fear one has in bringing another kid into a collapsing civilisation where there may not be food or clean water or energy, and the guilt a parent would feel from that. not to mention a child born in the western world consumes four-times the food/resources than the other two-thirds of humanity. however i do believe the desire to have children is instinctual, as well as wanting to share in the joy of childbirth and love for a child and the love returned.

  • G00gl3456

    LESS people should have kids.

  • V!

    That is an actual valid point.

  • Ann
  • http://james.lab6.com James

    Having children is a long-term backup strategy. Who’s going to host, maintain and curate your data when you’re gone? This was (and still is) a prime motivator even before data was digital. Your data is what defines you outside the confines of your own head. It is the sum of all your attributes – your works, your opinions, your history, traces of your interactions with others, their professed opinions of you, their memories of you, evidence of your life, and so forth. In the distant past, the data we left behind was ephemeral – mostly just memories and myth. Now, we leave behind vast quantities of data – and hence vast quantities of ourselves. Having children has always been about preserving what you can of yourself – to attain the best possible degree of immortality.

    • Jwest

      This is a reason, I suppose, but not a good one. Most people’s “data” is not important to the grand scheme of things. Wanting self perpetuation is merely selfish. Not valid when we’re thinking in terms of social responsibility.

      If by data you mean genetic material, then this is the biological argument. Propagating your genes in as many ways as you can. We’re too intelligent for that now.

  • quest 19

    You are very wise. i’ve been pondering the same thing yet it’s depressing to think about so i’m glad i found this post which vocalizes my feelings so well.

  • Sam

    For someone who views themself as being a collection of electrical impulses, conscience borders on the absurd. The only reason it may have evolved is to help society as a whole, but why should any one person not kill, steal, and rape? It makes no sense to adopt when one can have their own child and connect with it more, or even to care for their own child outside of whatever enjoyable electro-chemical impulse providing care rewards with.

    Having said that, I admit to being biased entirely. It is obvious to me that G-d exists, and wants us to do good to others. I had children as a conscious decision to benefit others. Not group mentality, not selfishness, and certainly not a mistake. It is the same reason I run a youth group, and have taken other children into our home [and adoption is a possibility].

    Good luck.

  • Ksid7213

    I generally agree but there is a big problem with this-that is who can guarantee that your children whom you decide not to have would not be the ones who will save the humanity from global warming/hunger/water shortage etc. It’s the same with prohibiting disabled people from having kids-if that was the case we would not have S.Hawking F.Dostoyevskiy J.Nash and many more.So I think limiting number of biological children to 1 or maybe 2 and adopting the rest if 2 is not enough seem like a reasonable solution

  • Steve

    You may find the following book helpful in your consideration of this issue. It was written by a philosopher who argues against having children: http://www.amazon.com/Better-Never-Have-Been-Existence/dp/0199549265/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1313429024&sr=1-1

  • Andreas

    Hi Daniel Interesting blog you got here. Do you think it is okay for some people to have children or do you think that all people should avoid it? I can’t help but think it would be sad if mankind died out. But I do agree that it is very questionable whether it is moral to have children. Some people are obviously better suited as parents than others. I would love to have children if I believed that I would be a great parent and if I believed that my wife would be as well. Also, do you know if there are any other good blogs that have written about this topic?

  • http://wisdomwebsite.com/ Kenneth Benjamin

    I’m coming way late to the game here, but for the record, reproduction is our only ‘purpose’ in life.

    Should we use our brains and supersede our genetic programming? Yes, most definitely.

    But, if you’re going to ask why, understand you’re asking something just one step away from “why do you exist.”

    I wrote all this up a couple of months ago in “The Meaning Of Life” here http://wisdomwebsite.com/the-meaning-of-life/


Top

Popular

Information Security / Technology

Politics

Philosophy & Religion

Technology & Science

Culture & Society

Miscellaneous

Arguments

Projects

Collections

Twitter

What I'm Reading

Favorite Books and Essays

Top Blog Categories

Inputs