I.Q.-Enhancement and Napping as Methods of Improving Business Efficiency
By Daniel Miessler on July 5th, 2008: Tagged as Business | Intelligence

http://iqcomparisonsite.com/
It frustrates me that our major institutions, e.g. public education, the common business environment, etc. do not embrace proven methods of improving performance.
I wonder, for example, how much overall efficiency could be gained by experimenting with two simple programs:
- Allowing workers to take a 20-30 minute nap in the afternoon
- Doing a program to increase to improve fluid memory (and therefore I.Q.)
Does it seem extremely odd to anyone else that these things — especially the I.Q. raise — require very little time and the ability to improve worker performance in almost every area, yet nobody is even taking notice?
I.Q. points are platinum. Intelligent people (assuming they have good methodologies) are better problem solvers. Having one or two smart guys on an engineering team is possibly better than having ten average ones — even if they’re experienced.
So how can any manager dismiss the possibility of instantly upgrading their team in a way that no training class, degree, or certification could ever hope to do?
It seems the business world would rather just keep grinding along at their own mediocre pace than take a risk of losing valuable “grind time” doing some crazy progressive crap. Hell, I might as well be talking about taking time off to meditate, or to sacrifice a flower to the God of photosynthesis (It doesn’t work, by the way).
So, I for one am going to actually evaluate this memory/I.Q.-improvement program. And if I like it, i.e. it seems to actually work, I’m going to propose to my manager that we give it a shot. It supposedly only takes like 20-30 minutes a day to do, and results in a major study showed that it significantly boosted the I.Q.s of those who used it.
Am I loopy here, or does this not make sense?
As for the napping, I’m just doing that on my own as part of my lunch break. That’s an even harder sell.: