<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone 3GS Renders Webpages over 120% Faster than the 3G</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/iphone-3gs-renders-webpages-over-120-faster-than-the-3g/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/iphone-3gs-renders-webpages-over-120-faster-than-the-3g</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aid</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/iphone-3gs-renders-webpages-over-120-faster-than-the-3g/comment-page-1#comment-242440</link>
		<dc:creator>aid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielmiessler.com/blog/iphone-3gs-renders-webpages-over-120-faster-than-the-3g#comment-242440</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is one hell of a lot more cache to help the processor along on your new phone.  L1 cache has gone from 32MB to 64MB and a whole new 256MB of L2 cache has been introduced.  It looks like that sure does keep those processor cycles filled!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can but guess that Apple has been observing the iPhone 3G; noticing that the CPU has been waiting on the main RAM; reducing its effectiveness...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve not yet got to play with a 3GS yet - I hope I&#039;m not all that impressed as I could do saving the cash right now :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one hell of a lot more cache to help the processor along on your new phone.  L1 cache has gone from 32MB to 64MB and a whole new 256MB of L2 cache has been introduced.  It looks like that sure does keep those processor cycles filled!<br /><br />I can but guess that Apple has been observing the iPhone 3G; noticing that the CPU has been waiting on the main RAM; reducing its effectiveness&#8230;<br /><br />I&#39;ve not yet got to play with a 3GS yet &#8211; I hope I&#39;m not all that impressed as I could do saving the cash right now :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

