<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Helping&#8221; Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/helping-iraq/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/helping-iraq</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:44:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/helping-iraq/comment-page-1#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/513#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How about your option #1, but we wait until things won&#039;t go to hell
when we leave?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe #2 is not possible. The media loves a disaster - &quot;If it
bleeds, it leads&quot; is a given. (isn&#039;t it?) I do not believe that the
American military would be able to get CNN, NPR, the BBC and Al
Jazeera (not to mention all the bloggers) to &quot;pretend the Iraqis are
in charge.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You allow that leaving early and letting it all go to hell would &quot;make
the sacrifices of everyone killed nearly worthless&quot; and then go on to
say that we should help them build an anti-American government if
that&#039;s what they want.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wouldn&#039;t that also diminsh the sacrifices of the coalition dead and of
the innocents deliberately targeted by the &quot;insurgents&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I mean no offense to you - I know this is a topic that gets emotions
going very easily. If I worded something poorly, please believe my
purpose is to understand your view of the situation. (&quot;grep
understanding&quot; and all.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about your option #1, but we wait until things won&#8217;t go to hell
when we leave?</p>

<p>I believe #2 is not possible. The media loves a disaster &#8211; &#8220;If it
bleeds, it leads&#8221; is a given. (isn&#8217;t it?) I do not believe that the
American military would be able to get CNN, NPR, the BBC and Al
Jazeera (not to mention all the bloggers) to &#8220;pretend the Iraqis are
in charge.&#8221;</p>

<p>You allow that leaving early and letting it all go to hell would &#8220;make
the sacrifices of everyone killed nearly worthless&#8221; and then go on to
say that we should help them build an anti-American government if
that&#8217;s what they want.</p>

<p>Wouldn&#8217;t that also diminsh the sacrifices of the coalition dead and of
the innocents deliberately targeted by the &#8220;insurgents&#8221;?</p>

<p>I mean no offense to you &#8211; I know this is a topic that gets emotions
going very easily. If I worded something poorly, please believe my
purpose is to understand your view of the situation. (&#8220;grep
understanding&#8221; and all.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/helping-iraq/comment-page-1#comment-245546</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/513#comment-245546</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How about your option #1, but we wait until things won&#039;t go to hell
when we leave?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe #2 is not possible. The media loves a disaster - &quot;If it
bleeds, it leads&quot; is a given. (isn&#039;t it?) I do not believe that the
American military would be able to get CNN, NPR, the BBC and Al
Jazeera (not to mention all the bloggers) to &quot;pretend the Iraqis are
in charge.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You allow that leaving early and letting it all go to hell would &quot;make
the sacrifices of everyone killed nearly worthless&quot; and then go on to
say that we should help them build an anti-American government if
that&#039;s what they want.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wouldn&#039;t that also diminsh the sacrifices of the coalition dead and of
the innocents deliberately targeted by the &quot;insurgents&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I mean no offense to you - I know this is a topic that gets emotions
going very easily. If I worded something poorly, please believe my
purpose is to understand your view of the situation. (&quot;grep
understanding&quot; and all.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about your option #1, but we wait until things won&#8217;t go to hell
when we leave?</p>

<p>I believe #2 is not possible. The media loves a disaster &#8211; &#8220;If it
bleeds, it leads&#8221; is a given. (isn&#8217;t it?) I do not believe that the
American military would be able to get CNN, NPR, the BBC and Al
Jazeera (not to mention all the bloggers) to &#8220;pretend the Iraqis are
in charge.&#8221;</p>

<p>You allow that leaving early and letting it all go to hell would &#8220;make
the sacrifices of everyone killed nearly worthless&#8221; and then go on to
say that we should help them build an anti-American government if
that&#8217;s what they want.</p>

<p>Wouldn&#8217;t that also diminsh the sacrifices of the coalition dead and of
the innocents deliberately targeted by the &#8220;insurgents&#8221;?</p>

<p>I mean no offense to you &#8211; I know this is a topic that gets emotions
going very easily. If I worded something poorly, please believe my
purpose is to understand your view of the situation. (&#8220;grep
understanding&#8221; and all.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

