Comments on: Fun With Numbers http://danielmiessler.com/blog/fun-with-numbers grep understanding Fri, 25 May 2012 02:15:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Daniel Miessler http://danielmiessler.com/blog/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-29985 Daniel Miessler Tue, 20 Feb 2007 04:51:20 +0000 http://dmiessler.com/archives/1153#comment-29985 <p>I think I agree. There's probably some shred of real information here, but the 8 and 9 are so obvious.</p> I think I agree. There’s probably some shred of real information here, but the 8 and 9 are so obvious.

]]> By: Daniel Miessler http://danielmiessler.com/blog/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-247036 Daniel Miessler Tue, 20 Feb 2007 04:51:00 +0000 http://dmiessler.com/archives/1153#comment-247036 <p>I think I agree. There's probably some shred of real information here, but the 8 and 9 are so obvious.</p> I think I agree. There’s probably some shred of real information here, but the 8 and 9 are so obvious.

]]> By: Arik http://danielmiessler.com/blog/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-29984 Arik Tue, 20 Feb 2007 04:47:44 +0000 http://dmiessler.com/archives/1153#comment-29984 <p>Donno about that, looks a bit like the drawn numbers were drawn to fit the theory rather to prove it. Look at 7, 8, 9 and 2.</p> <p>Sorry, personally I don't buy it. Take a look at older numerals in http://www.skypoint.com/~waltzmn/Mathematics.html#Ancient</p> <p>Also, since the Arabs invented the modern day Algebra and the zero, you'd think their numbers are the "originals" Arabic numerals. No angles there. Take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_numerals</p> <p>-- Arik</p> Donno about that, looks a bit like the drawn numbers were drawn to fit the theory rather to prove it. Look at 7, 8, 9 and 2.

Sorry, personally I don’t buy it. Take a look at older numerals in http://www.skypoint.com/~waltzmn/Mathematics.html#Ancient

Also, since the Arabs invented the modern day Algebra and the zero, you’d think their numbers are the “originals” Arabic numerals. No angles there. Take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_numerals

– Arik

]]> By: Arik http://danielmiessler.com/blog/fun-with-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-247035 Arik Tue, 20 Feb 2007 04:47:00 +0000 http://dmiessler.com/archives/1153#comment-247035 <p>Donno about that, looks a bit like the drawn numbers were drawn to fit the theory rather to prove it. Look at 7, 8, 9 and 2.</p> <p>Sorry, personally I don't buy it. Take a look at older numerals in http://www.skypoint.com/~waltzmn/Mathematics.html#Ancient</p> <p>Also, since the Arabs invented the modern day Algebra and the zero, you'd think their numbers are the "originals" Arabic numerals. No angles there. Take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_numerals</p> <p>-- Arik</p> Donno about that, looks a bit like the drawn numbers were drawn to fit the theory rather to prove it. Look at 7, 8, 9 and 2.

Sorry, personally I don’t buy it. Take a look at older numerals in http://www.skypoint.com/~waltzmn/Mathematics.html#Ancient

Also, since the Arabs invented the modern day Algebra and the zero, you’d think their numbers are the “originals” Arabic numerals. No angles there. Take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_numerals

– Arik

]]>