<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frog-Slaying with Danzig</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/frog-slaying-with-danzig/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/frog-slaying-with-danzig</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/frog-slaying-with-danzig/comment-page-1#comment-7560</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/922#comment-7560</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Speed bump, sorta suxs though, but I&#039;ll feel bad while I&#039;m eating hamburger for lunch.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speed bump, sorta suxs though, but I&#8217;ll feel bad while I&#8217;m eating hamburger for lunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/frog-slaying-with-danzig/comment-page-1#comment-246334</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/922#comment-246334</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Speed bump, sorta suxs though, but I&#039;ll feel bad while I&#039;m eating hamburger for lunch.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speed bump, sorta suxs though, but I&#8217;ll feel bad while I&#8217;m eating hamburger for lunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/frog-slaying-with-danzig/comment-page-1#comment-7484</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/922#comment-7484</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bah.  If the frogs are too dumb to avoid a huge metal beast roaring at them at 60 mph, they&#039;re too dumb to live.  It&#039;s Darwinism.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Besides, the legal and defensive thing to do when an animal (or group of animals) crosses your path is to just hit it... though if it&#039;s a big animal that could cause an accident it&#039;s good to slow down or even stop.  Swerving is a big no-no under any circumstances, but there&#039;s a big difference between &quot;swerving&quot; and &quot;driving around an obstacle&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That was actually something my instructor stressed when I had to take defensive driving class.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instructor: (pointing at a squirrel running across the road in a paused video) What do we do about that squirrel?  Rachel?
Rachel: (moment of thought) Well I don&#039;t want to say hit it... but it&#039;s better than swerving to miss it.
Instructor: Good girl, Rachel -- that&#039;s right.  Hit it.  Swerving can cause you to lose control of the vehicle or cause an accident.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We then discussed bigger animals, like dogs or deer.  Basically it&#039;s the same principle.  If you try to swerve to miss a deer, chances are you&#039;ll hit it anyway and you&#039;re more likely to run off the road because your tires won&#039;t be straight upon impact.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Once (in my old car) I hit a dog.  A big dog.  It was 11pm, and yes, the dog was &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; dead.  No collar or anything, though.  In any event, my instinct (to simply brake) was correct.  When I composed myself and drove on, I noticed that I went over a bridge about 15 feet later.  If I had swerved to miss the dog, there was a good chance I would have hit the railing or even run off the bridge completely.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah.  If the frogs are too dumb to avoid a huge metal beast roaring at them at 60 mph, they&#8217;re too dumb to live.  It&#8217;s Darwinism.</p>

<p>Besides, the legal and defensive thing to do when an animal (or group of animals) crosses your path is to just hit it&#8230; though if it&#8217;s a big animal that could cause an accident it&#8217;s good to slow down or even stop.  Swerving is a big no-no under any circumstances, but there&#8217;s a big difference between &#8220;swerving&#8221; and &#8220;driving around an obstacle&#8221;.</p>

<p>That was actually something my instructor stressed when I had to take defensive driving class.</p>

<p>Instructor: (pointing at a squirrel running across the road in a paused video) What do we do about that squirrel?  Rachel?
Rachel: (moment of thought) Well I don&#8217;t want to say hit it&#8230; but it&#8217;s better than swerving to miss it.
Instructor: Good girl, Rachel &#8212; that&#8217;s right.  Hit it.  Swerving can cause you to lose control of the vehicle or cause an accident.</p>

<p>We then discussed bigger animals, like dogs or deer.  Basically it&#8217;s the same principle.  If you try to swerve to miss a deer, chances are you&#8217;ll hit it anyway and you&#8217;re more likely to run off the road because your tires won&#8217;t be straight upon impact.</p>

<p>Once (in my old car) I hit a dog.  A big dog.  It was 11pm, and yes, the dog was <i>very</i> dead.  No collar or anything, though.  In any event, my instinct (to simply brake) was correct.  When I composed myself and drove on, I noticed that I went over a bridge about 15 feet later.  If I had swerved to miss the dog, there was a good chance I would have hit the railing or even run off the bridge completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/frog-slaying-with-danzig/comment-page-1#comment-246333</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/922#comment-246333</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bah.  If the frogs are too dumb to avoid a huge metal beast roaring at them at 60 mph, they&#039;re too dumb to live.  It&#039;s Darwinism.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Besides, the legal and defensive thing to do when an animal (or group of animals) crosses your path is to just hit it... though if it&#039;s a big animal that could cause an accident it&#039;s good to slow down or even stop.  Swerving is a big no-no under any circumstances, but there&#039;s a big difference between &quot;swerving&quot; and &quot;driving around an obstacle&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That was actually something my instructor stressed when I had to take defensive driving class.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instructor: (pointing at a squirrel running across the road in a paused video) What do we do about that squirrel?  Rachel?
Rachel: (moment of thought) Well I don&#039;t want to say hit it... but it&#039;s better than swerving to miss it.
Instructor: Good girl, Rachel -- that&#039;s right.  Hit it.  Swerving can cause you to lose control of the vehicle or cause an accident.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We then discussed bigger animals, like dogs or deer.  Basically it&#039;s the same principle.  If you try to swerve to miss a deer, chances are you&#039;ll hit it anyway and you&#039;re more likely to run off the road because your tires won&#039;t be straight upon impact.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Once (in my old car) I hit a dog.  A big dog.  It was 11pm, and yes, the dog was &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; dead.  No collar or anything, though.  In any event, my instinct (to simply brake) was correct.  When I composed myself and drove on, I noticed that I went over a bridge about 15 feet later.  If I had swerved to miss the dog, there was a good chance I would have hit the railing or even run off the bridge completely.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah.  If the frogs are too dumb to avoid a huge metal beast roaring at them at 60 mph, they&#8217;re too dumb to live.  It&#8217;s Darwinism.</p>

<p>Besides, the legal and defensive thing to do when an animal (or group of animals) crosses your path is to just hit it&#8230; though if it&#8217;s a big animal that could cause an accident it&#8217;s good to slow down or even stop.  Swerving is a big no-no under any circumstances, but there&#8217;s a big difference between &#8220;swerving&#8221; and &#8220;driving around an obstacle&#8221;.</p>

<p>That was actually something my instructor stressed when I had to take defensive driving class.</p>

<p>Instructor: (pointing at a squirrel running across the road in a paused video) What do we do about that squirrel?  Rachel?
Rachel: (moment of thought) Well I don&#8217;t want to say hit it&#8230; but it&#8217;s better than swerving to miss it.
Instructor: Good girl, Rachel &#8212; that&#8217;s right.  Hit it.  Swerving can cause you to lose control of the vehicle or cause an accident.</p>

<p>We then discussed bigger animals, like dogs or deer.  Basically it&#8217;s the same principle.  If you try to swerve to miss a deer, chances are you&#8217;ll hit it anyway and you&#8217;re more likely to run off the road because your tires won&#8217;t be straight upon impact.</p>

<p>Once (in my old car) I hit a dog.  A big dog.  It was 11pm, and yes, the dog was <i>very</i> dead.  No collar or anything, though.  In any event, my instinct (to simply brake) was correct.  When I composed myself and drove on, I noticed that I went over a bridge about 15 feet later.  If I had swerved to miss the dog, there was a good chance I would have hit the railing or even run off the bridge completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl M</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/frog-slaying-with-danzig/comment-page-1#comment-7482</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/922#comment-7482</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Clearly this was God&#039;s way of punishing you for listening to Danzig.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly this was God&#8217;s way of punishing you for listening to Danzig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl M</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/frog-slaying-with-danzig/comment-page-1#comment-246332</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/922#comment-246332</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Clearly this was God&#039;s way of punishing you for listening to Danzig.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly this was God&#8217;s way of punishing you for listening to Danzig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

