Comments on: Dumping Intense Debate

By: David Precious

David Precious — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:15:17 +0000

Glad to hear it, I have to admit I wasn’t that keen on ID to be honest; relying on Javascript to load comments from an external source seems like a nasty idea (and meant the comments + comment form were completely missing for me, until I set NoScript to allow them through).

By: David Precious

David Precious — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:15:00 +0000

By: Dave

Dave — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:47:21 +0000

I preferred the peanut gallery =)

By: Dave

Dave — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:47:00 +0000

I preferred the peanut gallery =)

By: kt

kt — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:54:15 +0000

now that’s not fair. They are still a new company and can’t handle that much traffic yet! It’s not their fault. Give the new guy a break!

By: kt

kt — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:54:00 +0000

now that’s not fair. They are still a new company and can’t handle that much traffic yet! It’s not their fault. Give the new guy a break!

By: Marcin

Marcin — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:18:37 +0000

Finally dude... loading another script from another website isn't good, especially when it's your entire comment functionality. pfft.

By: Marcin

Marcin — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:18:00 +0000

Finally dude... loading another script from another website isn't good, especially when it's your entire comment functionality. pfft.

By: Steven G. Harms

Steven G. Harms — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:05:56 +0000

Which means the regular old peanut gallery will post again!

BTW. You may want to take div#sidebar < div#container < body < html 's width towards 130px from 160 px. The ul dots are getting into the comment field ( you may have made that tweak for the ID engine? ).

steven

By: Steven G. Harms

Steven G. Harms — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:05:00 +0000

Which means the regular old peanut gallery will post again!

steven