<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BioPassword: Two-Factor Authentication The Easy Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/biopassword/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/biopassword</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:15:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/biopassword/comment-page-1#comment-8121</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/943#comment-8121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have been watching Daniel type for years. I am all really good at picking up on things like that. I could only get a 20 when I tried to log in with his username and password. That being said it was better then most in the room by 10 or better.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been watching Daniel type for years. I am all really good at picking up on things like that. I could only get a 20 when I tried to log in with his username and password. That being said it was better then most in the room by 10 or better.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/biopassword/comment-page-1#comment-8119</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/943#comment-8119</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, they watch me log in multiple times, and it&#039;s not really copyable. As for the sensitivity, it&#039;s a adjustable.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, they watch me log in multiple times, and it&#8217;s not really copyable. As for the sensitivity, it&#8217;s a adjustable.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl M</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/biopassword/comment-page-1#comment-8117</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 18:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/943#comment-8117</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m curious if you let them watch you log on first.  I&#039;m just wondering how sensitive the software is.  I mean, when we keep the same password for an extended time (a big no-no of course) we develop a rhythm for typing both our username and password.  If we change our password frequently, the rhythm will be substantially different (though perhaps fairly consistent).  Anyway, the software can&#039;t be TOO picky since our rhythms are not 100% consistent.  So, I&#039;m wondering if someone watching you log on could mimic your rhythm sufficiently well to fool the software.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious if you let them watch you log on first.  I&#8217;m just wondering how sensitive the software is.  I mean, when we keep the same password for an extended time (a big no-no of course) we develop a rhythm for typing both our username and password.  If we change our password frequently, the rhythm will be substantially different (though perhaps fairly consistent).  Anyway, the software can&#8217;t be TOO picky since our rhythms are not 100% consistent.  So, I&#8217;m wondering if someone watching you log on could mimic your rhythm sufficiently well to fool the software.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
