<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to Firefox?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/back-to-firefox/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/back-to-firefox</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 12:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hutton</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/back-to-firefox/comment-page-1#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/596#comment-2209</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I switched.  The aesthete in me had to get &quot;Firefoxy&quot; to make the widgets look less &quot;Motif&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I miss a few things with one complaint:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1.)  Clicking on what should be an RSS icon in the URL bar (like Safari) brings up &quot;Live bookmarking&quot;.  I just want feeds to register with NetNewsWire (like they do in Safari).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2.)  Stability, it doens&#039;t blow up on crappy javascript like Safari, but the OS X build &quot;feels&quot; less stable once you start loading all these cool extentions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;3.)  SPELLCHECK!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;4.) Crappier Popup blocking&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My big complaint?  Processor usage.  I have a 1.5ghz powerbook, and Firefox can peg me pretty easily.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The nice parts:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Extentions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It seems faster.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Being a little part of the Firefox &quot;revolution&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switched.  The aesthete in me had to get &#8220;Firefoxy&#8221; to make the widgets look less &#8220;Motif&#8221;.</p>

<p>I miss a few things with one complaint:</p>

<p>1.)  Clicking on what should be an RSS icon in the URL bar (like Safari) brings up &#8220;Live bookmarking&#8221;.  I just want feeds to register with NetNewsWire (like they do in Safari).</p>

<p>2.)  Stability, it doens&#8217;t blow up on crappy javascript like Safari, but the OS X build &#8220;feels&#8221; less stable once you start loading all these cool extentions.</p>

<p>3.)  SPELLCHECK!</p>

<p>4.) Crappier Popup blocking</p>

<p>My big complaint?  Processor usage.  I have a 1.5ghz powerbook, and Firefox can peg me pretty easily.</p>

<p>The nice parts:</p>

<p>Extentions.</p>

<p>It seems faster.</p>

<p>Being a little part of the Firefox &#8220;revolution&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hutton</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/back-to-firefox/comment-page-1#comment-245672</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/596#comment-245672</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I switched.  The aesthete in me had to get &quot;Firefoxy&quot; to make the widgets look less &quot;Motif&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I miss a few things with one complaint:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1.)  Clicking on what should be an RSS icon in the URL bar (like Safari) brings up &quot;Live bookmarking&quot;.  I just want feeds to register with NetNewsWire (like they do in Safari).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2.)  Stability, it doens&#039;t blow up on crappy javascript like Safari, but the OS X build &quot;feels&quot; less stable once you start loading all these cool extentions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;3.)  SPELLCHECK!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;4.) Crappier Popup blocking&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My big complaint?  Processor usage.  I have a 1.5ghz powerbook, and Firefox can peg me pretty easily.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The nice parts:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Extentions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It seems faster.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Being a little part of the Firefox &quot;revolution&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switched.  The aesthete in me had to get &#8220;Firefoxy&#8221; to make the widgets look less &#8220;Motif&#8221;.</p>

<p>I miss a few things with one complaint:</p>

<p>1.)  Clicking on what should be an RSS icon in the URL bar (like Safari) brings up &#8220;Live bookmarking&#8221;.  I just want feeds to register with NetNewsWire (like they do in Safari).</p>

<p>2.)  Stability, it doens&#8217;t blow up on crappy javascript like Safari, but the OS X build &#8220;feels&#8221; less stable once you start loading all these cool extentions.</p>

<p>3.)  SPELLCHECK!</p>

<p>4.) Crappier Popup blocking</p>

<p>My big complaint?  Processor usage.  I have a 1.5ghz powerbook, and Firefox can peg me pretty easily.</p>

<p>The nice parts:</p>

<p>Extentions.</p>

<p>It seems faster.</p>

<p>Being a little part of the Firefox &#8220;revolution&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/back-to-firefox/comment-page-1#comment-2206</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/596#comment-2206</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, on the windows front at least, FF 1.5 is shaping up really well.  There&#039;s one feature that made the transition from 1.0 to 1.5rc all worthwhile.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The ability to move tabs.  That&#039;s right.  It seems intuitive that once you have tabs you should be able to move them around and re-order them, but until 1.5, you had to find a special extension to do it for you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Until 1.0 came out, there was a &lt;em&gt;great&lt;/em&gt; extension to do it, but afterwards, you had to use an extension that did it but had &quot;extra features&quot; that tried to replace another extension (Tabbrowsing preferences), and did a rather crappy job of it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It seems like a simple pleasure, but I&#039;m glad it&#039;s been incorporated into the main FF build.  Maybe my other favorite extensions will be incorporated in time as well!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, on the windows front at least, FF 1.5 is shaping up really well.  There&#8217;s one feature that made the transition from 1.0 to 1.5rc all worthwhile.</p>

<p>The ability to move tabs.  That&#8217;s right.  It seems intuitive that once you have tabs you should be able to move them around and re-order them, but until 1.5, you had to find a special extension to do it for you.</p>

<p>Until 1.0 came out, there was a <em>great</em> extension to do it, but afterwards, you had to use an extension that did it but had &#8220;extra features&#8221; that tried to replace another extension (Tabbrowsing preferences), and did a rather crappy job of it.</p>

<p>It seems like a simple pleasure, but I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s been incorporated into the main FF build.  Maybe my other favorite extensions will be incorporated in time as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/back-to-firefox/comment-page-1#comment-245671</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/archives/596#comment-245671</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, on the windows front at least, FF 1.5 is shaping up really well.  There&#039;s one feature that made the transition from 1.0 to 1.5rc all worthwhile.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The ability to move tabs.  That&#039;s right.  It seems intuitive that once you have tabs you should be able to move them around and re-order them, but until 1.5, you had to find a special extension to do it for you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Until 1.0 came out, there was a &lt;em&gt;great&lt;/em&gt; extension to do it, but afterwards, you had to use an extension that did it but had &quot;extra features&quot; that tried to replace another extension (Tabbrowsing preferences), and did a rather crappy job of it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It seems like a simple pleasure, but I&#039;m glad it&#039;s been incorporated into the main FF build.  Maybe my other favorite extensions will be incorporated in time as well!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, on the windows front at least, FF 1.5 is shaping up really well.  There&#8217;s one feature that made the transition from 1.0 to 1.5rc all worthwhile.</p>

<p>The ability to move tabs.  That&#8217;s right.  It seems intuitive that once you have tabs you should be able to move them around and re-order them, but until 1.5, you had to find a special extension to do it for you.</p>

<p>Until 1.0 came out, there was a <em>great</em> extension to do it, but afterwards, you had to use an extension that did it but had &#8220;extra features&#8221; that tried to replace another extension (Tabbrowsing preferences), and did a rather crappy job of it.</p>

<p>It seems like a simple pleasure, but I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s been incorporated into the main FF build.  Maybe my other favorite extensions will be incorporated in time as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

