<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Am I a Prescriptivist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:44:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonym</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist/comment-page-1#comment-130020</link>
		<dc:creator>anonym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist#comment-130020</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You misspelled coarse.  I&#039;m betting it&#039;s the results of a somewhat shortsighted and prescriptivist spellchecker. It could also be argued that &quot; it captures the spirit.&quot;, should be &quot; they capture the spirit.&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You misspelled coarse.  I&#8217;m betting it&#8217;s the results of a somewhat shortsighted and prescriptivist spellchecker. It could also be argued that &#8221; it captures the spirit.&#8221;, should be &#8221; they capture the spirit.&#8221;.</p>

<p>Cheers!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonym</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist/comment-page-1#comment-251199</link>
		<dc:creator>anonym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist#comment-251199</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You misspelled coarse.  I&#039;m betting it&#039;s the results of a somewhat shortsighted and prescriptivist spellchecker. It could also be argued that &quot; it captures the spirit.&quot;, should be &quot; they capture the spirit.&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You misspelled coarse.  I&#8217;m betting it&#8217;s the results of a somewhat shortsighted and prescriptivist spellchecker. It could also be argued that &#8221; it captures the spirit.&#8221;, should be &#8221; they capture the spirit.&#8221;.</p>

<p>Cheers!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxo</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist/comment-page-1#comment-129637</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist#comment-129637</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it depends on the context.  If a black person says &quot;aks&quot;, I don&#039;t have a problem with that in the context of day-to-day speech.  If I see it in a professional oration, it makes me cringe.
I try to speek clearly in my day-to-day speech, but when it comes to &quot;Mike, Michelle, and I&quot; I only use that when giving speeches at work or school because I think the grammarians are wrong on that, but they do dictate the professional rules.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it depends on the context.  If a black person says &#8220;aks&#8221;, I don&#8217;t have a problem with that in the context of day-to-day speech.  If I see it in a professional oration, it makes me cringe.
I try to speek clearly in my day-to-day speech, but when it comes to &#8220;Mike, Michelle, and I&#8221; I only use that when giving speeches at work or school because I think the grammarians are wrong on that, but they do dictate the professional rules.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxo</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist/comment-page-1#comment-251198</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist#comment-251198</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it depends on the context.  If a black person says &quot;aks&quot;, I don&#039;t have a problem with that in the context of day-to-day speech.  If I see it in a professional oration, it makes me cringe.
I try to speek clearly in my day-to-day speech, but when it comes to &quot;Mike, Michelle, and I&quot; I only use that when giving speeches at work or school because I think the grammarians are wrong on that, but they do dictate the professional rules.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it depends on the context.  If a black person says &#8220;aks&#8221;, I don&#8217;t have a problem with that in the context of day-to-day speech.  If I see it in a professional oration, it makes me cringe.
I try to speek clearly in my day-to-day speech, but when it comes to &#8220;Mike, Michelle, and I&#8221; I only use that when giving speeches at work or school because I think the grammarians are wrong on that, but they do dictate the professional rules.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robby Colvin</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist/comment-page-1#comment-129633</link>
		<dc:creator>Robby Colvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist#comment-129633</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m probably the same: somewhere in the middle, but leaning more towards  being a prescriptivist. Knowing how language is currently used is important, but current use that is just ignorant and wrong is hurting our language.  I don&#039;t see a problem with adding a verb like &quot;google&quot; to the dictionary or many other recent changes and additions, but common misuse of lie and lay for example is just wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m probably the same: somewhere in the middle, but leaning more towards  being a prescriptivist. Knowing how language is currently used is important, but current use that is just ignorant and wrong is hurting our language.  I don&#8217;t see a problem with adding a verb like &#8220;google&#8221; to the dictionary or many other recent changes and additions, but common misuse of lie and lay for example is just wrong.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robby Colvin</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist/comment-page-1#comment-251197</link>
		<dc:creator>Robby Colvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/am-i-a-prescriptivist#comment-251197</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m probably the same: somewhere in the middle, but leaning more towards  being a prescriptivist. Knowing how language is currently used is important, but current use that is just ignorant and wrong is hurting our language.  I don&#039;t see a problem with adding a verb like &quot;google&quot; to the dictionary or many other recent changes and additions, but common misuse of lie and lay for example is just wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m probably the same: somewhere in the middle, but leaning more towards  being a prescriptivist. Knowing how language is currently used is important, but current use that is just ignorant and wrong is hurting our language.  I don&#8217;t see a problem with adding a verb like &#8220;google&#8221; to the dictionary or many other recent changes and additions, but common misuse of lie and lay for example is just wrong.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

