A Ron Paul Republican Explains Why Obama is the Best Choice
By Daniel Miessler on October 5th, 2008: Tagged as Election 2008 | Obama | Politics

This short read is an absolute must for those out there clinging to true conservative, Ron Paul-esque values in this election. It’s very similar to what I wrote here, but much, much better.
A couple of my favorite excerpts:
In 1932, America needed a strong leader like FDR; in 1980, it needed a strong leader like Reagan. In 2008, it needs a strong leader like Paul or Obama (depending on one’s political views), but the last thing it needs is someone unstable, erratic and given to melodrama and grandstanding when it suits his whim.
Given the choice between McCain’s reckless, “now I don’t see a problem, now I see an economy about to crater” approach to the economy and Obama’s long-established understanding that things have been in bad shape for many years; between McCain’s overly dramatic tendencies toward grandstanding and Obama’s intelligent, rational decision-making processes; between a political party that exhibited a collective ignorance in rejecting their best and brightest candidate and a party that chose the candidate that best represents its values, Punditty sees it as a no-brainer.
I urge all my conservative friends who are not voting for Obama to read it and pass it along. And for those of you who are voting for Obama, please send this to your Republican friends who are still thinking rather than following.
[ GOP Nominated the Wrong Candidate, Making Obama the Best Choice In November | allvoices.com ]
Links
Related Content
- If You Truly Support Ron Paul You Won’t Stand By and Allow McCain to Destroy This Country For Another Four Years
- Paul Basically Says Obama the Best of the Three Candidates
- If McCain is the “Military” Candidate, Why Did Ron Paul, Who Wants to Pull Out of Iraq, Get More Campaign Contributions from the Military?
- A Letter to Ron Paul Supporters
- Question: When Do We, As Paul Supporters, Switch to Obama?