<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Brilliant Analysis of the GOP&#8217;s &#8220;Socialism&#8221; Cry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry</link>
	<description>grep understanding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 12:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-224133</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 05:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-224133</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jonathan, if you pointed me to a FOX article about content written by a liberal, that completely destroyed a major liberal argument -- HELL YEAH I would read it. And I would take it VERY seriously.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have no loyalty to my current model of understanding.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hearing &quot;my&quot; side arguing against &quot;my&quot; side is highly interesting to me. It represents an opportunity to learn something significant.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, if you pointed me to a FOX article about content written by a liberal, that completely destroyed a major liberal argument &#8212; HELL YEAH I would read it. And I would take it VERY seriously.</p>

<p>I have no loyalty to my current model of understanding.</p>

<p>Hearing &#8220;my&#8221; side arguing against &#8220;my&#8221; side is highly interesting to me. It represents an opportunity to learn something significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-253469</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 05:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-253469</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jonathan, if you pointed me to a FOX article about content written by a liberal, that completely destroyed a major liberal argument -- HELL YEAH I would read it. And I would take it VERY seriously.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have no loyalty to my current model of understanding.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hearing &quot;my&quot; side arguing against &quot;my&quot; side is highly interesting to me. It represents an opportunity to learn something significant.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, if you pointed me to a FOX article about content written by a liberal, that completely destroyed a major liberal argument &#8212; HELL YEAH I would read it. And I would take it VERY seriously.</p>

<p>I have no loyalty to my current model of understanding.</p>

<p>Hearing &#8220;my&#8221; side arguing against &#8220;my&#8221; side is highly interesting to me. It represents an opportunity to learn something significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-253470</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 05:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-253470</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jonathan, if you pointed me to a FOX article about content written by a liberal, that completely destroyed a major liberal argument -- HELL YEAH I would read it. And I would take it VERY seriously.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have no loyalty to my current model of understanding.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hearing &quot;my&quot; side arguing against &quot;my&quot; side is highly interesting to me. It represents an opportunity to learn something significant.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, if you pointed me to a FOX article about content written by a liberal, that completely destroyed a major liberal argument &#8212; HELL YEAH I would read it. And I would take it VERY seriously.</p>

<p>I have no loyalty to my current model of understanding.</p>

<p>Hearing &#8220;my&#8221; side arguing against &#8220;my&#8221; side is highly interesting to me. It represents an opportunity to learn something significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-224121</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-224121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am interested to hear what Obama supporters think about his future Chief of Staff&#039;s &quot;New contract for America&quot; : http://volokh.com/posts/1225908208.shtml&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested to hear what Obama supporters think about his future Chief of Staff&#8217;s &#8220;New contract for America&#8221; : <a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1225908208.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://volokh.com/posts/1225908208.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-253467</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-253467</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am interested to hear what Obama supporters think about his future Chief of Staff&#039;s &quot;New contract for America&quot; : http://volokh.com/posts/1225908208.shtml&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested to hear what Obama supporters think about his future Chief of Staff&#8217;s &#8220;New contract for America&#8221; : <a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1225908208.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://volokh.com/posts/1225908208.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-253468</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-253468</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am interested to hear what Obama supporters think about his future Chief of Staff&#039;s &quot;New contract for America&quot; : http://volokh.com/posts/1225908208.shtml&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested to hear what Obama supporters think about his future Chief of Staff&#8217;s &#8220;New contract for America&#8221; : <a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1225908208.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://volokh.com/posts/1225908208.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-224082</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-224082</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Daniel - I didn&#039;t miss the quote.  I disregarded it.  Of course people want those things.  Why wouldn&#039;t they?  And in a democracy, they can vote the right people in and get what they want.  That doesn&#039;t mean it is a good thing.  It is why libertarian-leaning economists and Reagan-type Republicans jump in and say &quot;Wait.  We want versions of these things too, but the way to get them is not by government mandate.  It&#039;s by letting the market do its job.&quot;  Except universal health-care or universal anything.  The price to go from 90% to 95% to 99% to 100% skyrockets.  I think most republicans are fine with a slightly progressive tax.  Obama&#039;s plan is not &lt;em&gt;slightly&lt;/em&gt; progressive.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Maxo - McCain (as if it wasn&#039;t already obvious) sold out.  I don&#039;t necessarily blame him, he went after the moderate vote and undecided democrats.  His policies had to move left with him. The vast majority of the people want something, &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; to intervene and fix the economy and he had to offer some interventions that would usually go against a far-right party line.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Jonathon - I totally agree.  DailyKos is line with celebrity gossip columns. No fact checking, no analysis, just rumors and word-of-mouths.  But I agree that this story should be judged as it stands alone.  And still.... it&#039;s trash.  Just because he posts on a conservative blog doesn&#039;t make him a conservative.  It&#039;s pretty obvious by his views that he isn&#039;t very right-wing at all.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Jason - I agree, no one isn&#039;t pushing pure Socialism.  But they are pushing a &lt;em&gt;form of&lt;/em&gt; socialism.  We are able to call our current economy a capitalist economy even though it is most definitely not Capitalism either.  The definition you gave did not say anything about the &quot;micro level&quot; either.  You did.  The democratic party &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; promote &quot;a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state [...] ownership [...], and the creation of [a more] egalitarian society.&quot; (A little different than your definition, but pretty close)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel &#8211; I didn&#8217;t miss the quote.  I disregarded it.  Of course people want those things.  Why wouldn&#8217;t they?  And in a democracy, they can vote the right people in and get what they want.  That doesn&#8217;t mean it is a good thing.  It is why libertarian-leaning economists and Reagan-type Republicans jump in and say &#8220;Wait.  We want versions of these things too, but the way to get them is not by government mandate.  It&#8217;s by letting the market do its job.&#8221;  Except universal health-care or universal anything.  The price to go from 90% to 95% to 99% to 100% skyrockets.  I think most republicans are fine with a slightly progressive tax.  Obama&#8217;s plan is not <em>slightly</em> progressive.</p>

<p>@Maxo &#8211; McCain (as if it wasn&#8217;t already obvious) sold out.  I don&#8217;t necessarily blame him, he went after the moderate vote and undecided democrats.  His policies had to move left with him. The vast majority of the people want something, <em>anything</em> to intervene and fix the economy and he had to offer some interventions that would usually go against a far-right party line.</p>

<p>@Jonathon &#8211; I totally agree.  DailyKos is line with celebrity gossip columns. No fact checking, no analysis, just rumors and word-of-mouths.  But I agree that this story should be judged as it stands alone.  And still&#8230;. it&#8217;s trash.  Just because he posts on a conservative blog doesn&#8217;t make him a conservative.  It&#8217;s pretty obvious by his views that he isn&#8217;t very right-wing at all.</p>

<p>@Jason &#8211; I agree, no one isn&#8217;t pushing pure Socialism.  But they are pushing a <em>form of</em> socialism.  We are able to call our current economy a capitalist economy even though it is most definitely not Capitalism either.  The definition you gave did not say anything about the &#8220;micro level&#8221; either.  You did.  The democratic party <em>does</em> promote &#8220;a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state [...] ownership [...], and the creation of [a more] egalitarian society.&#8221; (A little different than your definition, but pretty close)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-253466</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-253466</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Daniel - I didn&#039;t miss the quote.  I disregarded it.  Of course people want those things.  Why wouldn&#039;t they?  And in a democracy, they can vote the right people in and get what they want.  That doesn&#039;t mean it is a good thing.  It is why libertarian-leaning economists and Reagan-type Republicans jump in and say &quot;Wait.  We want versions of these things too, but the way to get them is not by government mandate.  It&#039;s by letting the market do its job.&quot;  Except universal health-care or universal anything.  The price to go from 90% to 95% to 99% to 100% skyrockets.  I think most republicans are fine with a slightly progressive tax.  Obama&#039;s plan is not &lt;em&gt;slightly&lt;/em&gt; progressive.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Maxo - McCain (as if it wasn&#039;t already obvious) sold out.  I don&#039;t necessarily blame him, he went after the moderate vote and undecided democrats.  His policies had to move left with him. The vast majority of the people want something, &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; to intervene and fix the economy and he had to offer some interventions that would usually go against a far-right party line.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Jonathon - I totally agree.  DailyKos is line with celebrity gossip columns. No fact checking, no analysis, just rumors and word-of-mouths.  But I agree that this story should be judged as it stands alone.  And still.... it&#039;s trash.  Just because he posts on a conservative blog doesn&#039;t make him a conservative.  It&#039;s pretty obvious by his views that he isn&#039;t very right-wing at all.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Jason - I agree, no one isn&#039;t pushing pure Socialism.  But they are pushing a &lt;em&gt;form of&lt;/em&gt; socialism.  We are able to call our current economy a capitalist economy even though it is most definitely not Capitalism either.  The definition you gave did not say anything about the &quot;micro level&quot; either.  You did.  The democratic party &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; promote &quot;a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state [...] ownership [...], and the creation of [a more] egalitarian society.&quot; (A little different than your definition, but pretty close)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel &#8211; I didn&#8217;t miss the quote.  I disregarded it.  Of course people want those things.  Why wouldn&#8217;t they?  And in a democracy, they can vote the right people in and get what they want.  That doesn&#8217;t mean it is a good thing.  It is why libertarian-leaning economists and Reagan-type Republicans jump in and say &#8220;Wait.  We want versions of these things too, but the way to get them is not by government mandate.  It&#8217;s by letting the market do its job.&#8221;  Except universal health-care or universal anything.  The price to go from 90% to 95% to 99% to 100% skyrockets.  I think most republicans are fine with a slightly progressive tax.  Obama&#8217;s plan is not <em>slightly</em> progressive.</p>

<p>@Maxo &#8211; McCain (as if it wasn&#8217;t already obvious) sold out.  I don&#8217;t necessarily blame him, he went after the moderate vote and undecided democrats.  His policies had to move left with him. The vast majority of the people want something, <em>anything</em> to intervene and fix the economy and he had to offer some interventions that would usually go against a far-right party line.</p>

<p>@Jonathon &#8211; I totally agree.  DailyKos is line with celebrity gossip columns. No fact checking, no analysis, just rumors and word-of-mouths.  But I agree that this story should be judged as it stands alone.  And still&#8230;. it&#8217;s trash.  Just because he posts on a conservative blog doesn&#8217;t make him a conservative.  It&#8217;s pretty obvious by his views that he isn&#8217;t very right-wing at all.</p>

<p>@Jason &#8211; I agree, no one isn&#8217;t pushing pure Socialism.  But they are pushing a <em>form of</em> socialism.  We are able to call our current economy a capitalist economy even though it is most definitely not Capitalism either.  The definition you gave did not say anything about the &#8220;micro level&#8221; either.  You did.  The democratic party <em>does</em> promote &#8220;a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state [...] ownership [...], and the creation of [a more] egalitarian society.&#8221; (A little different than your definition, but pretty close)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-223940</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-223940</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Daniel - Absolutely I&#039;m serious. One would think you could judge content on its merits, instead of the source but I&#039;m going on statistics here. Isn&#039;t that what you do for those who claim to be Christians or news postings from foxnews.com?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel &#8211; Absolutely I&#8217;m serious. One would think you could judge content on its merits, instead of the source but I&#8217;m going on statistics here. Isn&#8217;t that what you do for those who claim to be Christians or news postings from foxnews.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-253464</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-253464</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Daniel - Absolutely I&#039;m serious. One would think you could judge content on its merits, instead of the source but I&#039;m going on statistics here. Isn&#039;t that what you do for those who claim to be Christians or news postings from foxnews.com?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel &#8211; Absolutely I&#8217;m serious. One would think you could judge content on its merits, instead of the source but I&#8217;m going on statistics here. Isn&#8217;t that what you do for those who claim to be Christians or news postings from foxnews.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-253465</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-253465</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Daniel - Absolutely I&#039;m serious. One would think you could judge content on its merits, instead of the source but I&#039;m going on statistics here. Isn&#039;t that what you do for those who claim to be Christians or news postings from foxnews.com?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel &#8211; Absolutely I&#8217;m serious. One would think you could judge content on its merits, instead of the source but I&#8217;m going on statistics here. Isn&#8217;t that what you do for those who claim to be Christians or news postings from foxnews.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Sares</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-223861</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Sares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-223861</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually none of this is Socialism (capital S):&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-- Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and the creation of an egalitarian society.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No one (mainstream) is suggesting the US Government control the production of goods at a micro level.  Socialism is what the USSR and China used to have.  Even China is much less of a true Socialist nation than it used to be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually none of this is Socialism (capital S):</p>

<p>&#8211; Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and the creation of an egalitarian society.</p>

<p>No one (mainstream) is suggesting the US Government control the production of goods at a micro level.  Socialism is what the USSR and China used to have.  Even China is much less of a true Socialist nation than it used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Sares</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-253462</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Sares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-253462</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually none of this is Socialism (capital S):&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-- Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and the creation of an egalitarian society.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No one (mainstream) is suggesting the US Government control the production of goods at a micro level.  Socialism is what the USSR and China used to have.  Even China is much less of a true Socialist nation than it used to be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually none of this is Socialism (capital S):</p>

<p>&#8211; Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and the creation of an egalitarian society.</p>

<p>No one (mainstream) is suggesting the US Government control the production of goods at a micro level.  Socialism is what the USSR and China used to have.  Even China is much less of a true Socialist nation than it used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Sares</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-253463</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Sares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-253463</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually none of this is Socialism (capital S):&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-- Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and the creation of an egalitarian society.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No one (mainstream) is suggesting the US Government control the production of goods at a micro level.  Socialism is what the USSR and China used to have.  Even China is much less of a true Socialist nation than it used to be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually none of this is Socialism (capital S):</p>

<p>&#8211; Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and the creation of an egalitarian society.</p>

<p>No one (mainstream) is suggesting the US Government control the production of goods at a micro level.  Socialism is what the USSR and China used to have.  Even China is much less of a true Socialist nation than it used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-223804</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-223804</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jonathan,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are you serious?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So when he posts a strong argument from a Republican it&#039;s automatically invalid because it&#039;s on his site? What if he posted a passage from Shakespeare? Or the Bible?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You should be able to judge content on its merits, regardless of source.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,</p>

<p>Are you serious?</p>

<p>So when he posts a strong argument from a Republican it&#8217;s automatically invalid because it&#8217;s on his site? What if he posted a passage from Shakespeare? Or the Bible?</p>

<p>You should be able to judge content on its merits, regardless of source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-253460</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-253460</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jonathan,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are you serious?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So when he posts a strong argument from a Republican it&#039;s automatically invalid because it&#039;s on his site? What if he posted a passage from Shakespeare? Or the Bible?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You should be able to judge content on its merits, regardless of source.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,</p>

<p>Are you serious?</p>

<p>So when he posts a strong argument from a Republican it&#8217;s automatically invalid because it&#8217;s on his site? What if he posted a passage from Shakespeare? Or the Bible?</p>

<p>You should be able to judge content on its merits, regardless of source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-253461</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-253461</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jonathan,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are you serious?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So when he posts a strong argument from a Republican it&#039;s automatically invalid because it&#039;s on his site? What if he posted a passage from Shakespeare? Or the Bible?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You should be able to judge content on its merits, regardless of source.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,</p>

<p>Are you serious?</p>

<p>So when he posts a strong argument from a Republican it&#8217;s automatically invalid because it&#8217;s on his site? What if he posted a passage from Shakespeare? Or the Bible?</p>

<p>You should be able to judge content on its merits, regardless of source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-223800</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-223800</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Daily Kos? lol. I take nothing seriously from Daily Kos. Far to biased and just not good reporting at all. It&#039;s simply propaganda.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daily Kos? lol. I take nothing seriously from Daily Kos. Far to biased and just not good reporting at all. It&#8217;s simply propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-253459</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-253459</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Daily Kos? lol. I take nothing seriously from Daily Kos. Far to biased and just not good reporting at all. It&#039;s simply propaganda.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daily Kos? lol. I take nothing seriously from Daily Kos. Far to biased and just not good reporting at all. It&#8217;s simply propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxo</title>
		<link>http://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry/comment-page-1#comment-223797</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/a-brilliant-analysis-of-the-gops-socialism-cry#comment-223797</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been arguing this point for a long time.  Our country has supported socialist parties across the board for a long time.  When debating politics I have made this simple point about McCain.  If he was a market-based capitalist his solution to most every problem would be to do nothing.  A large part of socialism is the idea that markets needed to be artificially nudged in the right direction by government when the markets don&#039;t work the way we want them.  Look at McCain&#039;s approach to healthcare.  If he trusted the markets he would come out and say he wants to do nothing.  He he trusted the markets in this economic crisis his approach would be no bailout.  If he trusted the markets for education he would try to dismantle the public education system.  This is not his approach to any of these, so if Obama is a socialist, then so is he.
The question at hand was not should we spread the wealth.  It was to whom should we spread it to.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been arguing this point for a long time.  Our country has supported socialist parties across the board for a long time.  When debating politics I have made this simple point about McCain.  If he was a market-based capitalist his solution to most every problem would be to do nothing.  A large part of socialism is the idea that markets needed to be artificially nudged in the right direction by government when the markets don&#8217;t work the way we want them.  Look at McCain&#8217;s approach to healthcare.  If he trusted the markets he would come out and say he wants to do nothing.  He he trusted the markets in this economic crisis his approach would be no bailout.  If he trusted the markets for education he would try to dismantle the public education system.  This is not his approach to any of these, so if Obama is a socialist, then so is he.
The question at hand was not should we spread the wealth.  It was to whom should we spread it to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

